Abstract:OBJECTIVE:To develop and evaluate scaling and scoring assumptions, and the reliability and the validity of a Chinese version of the SF-36 scales.METHODS:A multi-stage mixed sampling procedure was used to select a representative sample of the general population. The sample size was 1 000 households. All family members of a selected household, aged 18 and older, completed a survey by self-administration. Formal psychometric methods for testing assumptions underlying item scoring and scale construction were used according to the standard procedure of the IQOLA Project.RESULTS:Of the 1 985 collected questionnaires, 1 972 were qualified. Of them, 1 688 (85.6%) were respondents. 1 316 respondents answered all 36 items, while the remaining (372 respondents) answered with one or several missing responses. Among the non-respondents, 65.5% were illiteracy or quasi-illiteracy. The assumption of equal intervals was violated for the VT and MH scales. The recoded item values were used to calculate scale scores. The clustering and ordering of the item means were approximately the same as that of the source version and other two Chinese versions. The items in each scale had similar standard deviations except those in the PF, BP, SF scales. The correlations between an item and its hypothesized scale were identical for all except the SF and VT scales. The scaling success rates of convergent validity were 0% for the SF scale, 75% for the VT scale, and 100% for the other six scales. The scaling success rates of discriminat validity ranged from 87.5% to 100% for all scales except for the SF scale. The Cronbach' alpha coefficients of internal consistency reliability ranged from 0.72 to 0.88, which were satisfactory for group comparison except 0.39 for the SF scale and 0.66 for the VT scale. The two-weeks test-retest reliability coefficient ranged from 0.66 to 0.94. Factor analysis identified two principal components: a "physical" factor and a "mental" factor. Taken together, these two factors could be used to explain 56.3% of the total variance.CONCLUSION:The Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scale has achieved conceptual equivalence and satisfied the psychometric scaling assumptions well enough to warrant wide use in China. Known-groups validity will give more meaningful evidences of the validity of the Chinese SF-36 scales.

Evidences for Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of General Self-Efficacy Scale

A Preliminary Study on Self-constructionals Scales (scs)of Chinese-Version

Examining the Structure, Reliability, and Validity of the Chinese Personal Growth Initiative Scale–II: Evidence for the Importance of Intentional Self-Change among Chinese

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Social Anxiety Scale for Adolescents

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and validity of simple Chinese version of grit scale for elementary school students

The effect of varying stimulus and response modes and asymmetric transfer on the dual-task performance of discrete tasks.

Reliability and Vaiidatioa of the Social Comparison Orientation Scale

Validation of Emotional Intelligence Scale in Chinese University Students

Reliablity and Validity of the Domain-Specific Risk-taking Scale in Chinese College Students

Validation of the Emotional Intelligence Scale

A Psychometric Evaluation of the Career Decision Self-Efficacy Scale-Short Form in Chinese High School Students

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Psychometric evaluation of the Geneva Sentimentality Scale in Chinese college students

Psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale for the Transtheoretical Model: a confirmatory analysis among Chinese children and adolescents

Chlamydia pneumoniae infection during an influenza virus A epidemic: preliminary report.

Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale

Personalized medicine beyond genetics: using personalized model-based forecasting to help type 2 diabetics understand and predict their post-meal glucose

[The general self-efficacy scale (GSES): Reevaluation of its reliability and validity evidence in Chile].

Validating the Chinese Version of the Academic Grit Scale in Selected Adolescents

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule-Expanded in 660 college students