The Significance of Radionuclide Lung Perfusion Imaging in Assessment of the Pulmonary Blood Flow Distribution after Total Cavopulmonary Connection

楚军民,吴清玉,王文明,史蓉芳,刘秀杰
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.2095-2848.2001.06.008
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To evaluate the value of radionuclide lung perfusion imaging in assessment of the pulmonary blood flow distribution after total cavopulmonary connection (TCPC). Methods Nineteen consecutive patients with age ranging from 5~21 years who survived TCPC underwent radionuclide lung perfusion imaging. According to the radionuclide counts in left and right lungs to analysis the distribution of blood flow from superior vena cava (SVC) and inferior vena cava (IVC) and the whole pulmonary blood flow in both lungs. On the base of the anastomosis between IVC and pulmonary artery, all patients were divided into three groups. GroupⅠ( n =6): Patients after TCPC with the anastomosis of SVC and IVC directly opposites each other on the right pulmonary artery (RPA) with +imaging . GroupⅡ( n =10): Patients after the TCPC with the IVC connected to the main pulmonary artery (MPA) by extracardiac conduit or intraatrial lateral tunnel. Group Ⅲ ( n =3): Patients after the TCPC with the IVC connected to the main pulmonary artery (MPA) by extracardiac conduit with bilateral bidirectional cavopulmonary connection (BCPC). Results GroupⅠ: The flow from the SVC and IVC were mixed in the middle of the junction and turn toward the right and left lungs driving evenly in halves [SVC: (49±4.2)% to right lung, (51±4.2)% to left lung , t=0.113, P 0.05; IVC: (48±3.7)% to the left lung, (52±3.7)% to the right lung, t=0.29, P 0.05] ; the whole pulmonary blood flow went to both lungs dividing evenly in halves [(51±3.9)% to right lung,(49±3.9)% to left lung, t =0.131, P 0.05]. GroupⅡ:The flow proportion of the IVC to left lung was greater than that to the right lung, the blood flow went dominantly or completely to the left lung [(87±3.2)% to the left, (13±3.2)% to the right, t=8.22, P 0.01]; the flow proportion of the SVC to right lung was greater than that to the left lung , the blood flow went dominantly or completely to the right lung [(85±3.0)% to the right, (15±3.0)% to the left, t=6.84, P 0.01]; and the whole pulmonary blood flow went dominantly to left lung[(61±3.1)% to the left, (39±3.1)% to the right, P 0.05]. GroupⅢ: The flow from right SVC to right lung by 100% (right lung vs. left lung, P 0.01) and that from left SVC to left lung by 100% (right lung vs. left lung, P 0.01), the flow from IVC went dominantly to left lung and a small part went to right lung [(60±4.5)% to the left, (40±4.5)% to the right, P 0.05]. Conclusions Different designs of TCPC can result in different pulmonary blood distribution; radionuclide lung perfusion is a convenient, non-invasive, accurate and reproducible method, which allows quantitative analysis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?