Abstract:Abstract Background To evaluate the root canal preparation outcomes achieved by five nickel-titanium single-file instrumentation systems (M3-L, Reciproc Blue, V-Taper 2H, WaveOne Gold, XP-endo Shaper) in severely curved molar root canals. Methods A total of 60 root canals were selected from extracted human molar teeth with curvatures ranging from 25° to 50° and divided into five groups based on the instrumentation system employed (n = 12). Before and after root canal preparation, a Micro-CT scan was taken, and pre- and post-operative data were analyzed to evaluate the following parameters: volume increment of root canals (VI), untouched root canal areas (UTA), and canal transportation (CT). Apically extruded debris (AD) was collected during preparation. After that, all samples were separated into two parts and examined respectively by scanning electron microscope (SEM) to assess cleaning ability. Data were statistically analyzed with ANOVA (UTA, AD, VI) or Kruskal-Wallis test (CT, SEM-score), the level of significance was set at α = 0.05. Results There were no significant differences between the five systems regarding the AD, VI, and UTA parameters (P > 0.05). In terms of CT, no significant difference was noted at the straight section of canal and apical levels, while XP-endo Shaper showed less canal transportation than M3-L at the level of curved vertex (P < 0.05), and the centering ability of V-Taper 2H was significantly better than WaveOne Gold at the initial point of bending (P < 0.05). Debris and smear layers were present on the canal walls of all specimens, the apical thirds of the canal presented higher SEM scores than the coronal thirds in all groups (P < 0.05). Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper showed fewer smear scores than WaveOne Gold in the apical thirds (P < 0.01 and P < 0.05, respectively), and no statistical difference was found between other groups in the middle and coronal thirds. Conclusions The five single-file systems evaluated performed equally in apically debris extrusion, dentin removal, and untouched root canal areas, while XP-endo Shaper and V-Taper 2H resulted in less canal transportation compared to M3-L and WaveOne Gold. Regarding cleaning ability, Reciproc Blue and XP-endo Shaper were associated with less smear layer than WaveOne Gold in the apical thirds.

Comparison of Cleaning Efficiency of ProFile Rotary,ni-Ti Rotary,and SS Manual Endodontic Instruments in Curved Root Canals

A Comparative Study of Three Types of Instruments on Cleaning Efficiency in Root Canal Preparation

Cleaning Effectiveness and Shaping Ability of Rotary Protaper Compared with Rotary Gt and Manual K-Flexofile

Comparison of Cleaning Efficiency and Deformation Characteristics of Twisted File and ProTaper Rotary Instruments

Comparison of cleaning efficiency of sonic,ultrasonic endodontic instruments in root canals:a scanning electronic microscopic study

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF APICAL EXTRUSION OF DEBRIS AND SHAPING ABILITY IN CURVED ROOT CANALS USING FOUR DIFFERENT NITI INSTRUMENTS

Comparative study on preparing curved root canals with three types of instruments

Comparison on the Shaping Ability of Three Different Instruments in Preparing Curved Molar Canals

Sem Evaluation Of Canal Cleanliness Following Use Of Protaper Hand-Operated Rotary Instruments And Stainless Steel K-Files

A Comparative Study of Antimicrobial Efficacy of Three Different Instruments and Mechanical Preparation Techniques in Single Infected Root Canals

A Comparison of the Effect of Different Nickel⁃titanium Instruments Combined with Ultrasonic Irrigation on Root Canal Preparation

A Comparison of Apical Deviation of Curved Canals with Nickel-titanium Instruments

Comparative evaluation of apical debris extrusion during root canal preparation using three different rotary file systems

A Comparison of Instrument-Centering Ability Within the Root Canal for Three Contemporary Instrumentation Techniques

Clinical evaluation of three nickel-titanium rotary instruments in preparation of curved root canals]

A Comparative SEM Investigation of Smear Layer Remaining on Dentinal Walls by Three Rotary NiTi Files with Different Cross Sectional Designs in Moderately Curved Canals

A comparison of the removal of filling material with different instruments

A comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals

In Vitro Evaluation of Root Canal Preparation Using Two Rotary Ni- Ti Instruments

A comparative study of two different rotary nickel-titanium systems in the preparation of simulated resin curved canals performed by abecedarian

Comparison the cleaning effect on curved canal walls prepared with four different techniques