Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

Rationales and Principles on Building The Reasonable Criminal Procedure Structure in China

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

The Rationality of the Constrution of Interlocutory Proceedings in Criminal Procedure of China

Consideration On the Basic Revising Direction of PRC Criminal Procedure Code

Compendium of Rational Thinking on the Amendment of the Criminal Procedure Law

The Basic Logic of Constructing Legal Procedures

Reform of the Criminal Procedural System and the Distribution of the Procuratorial Power

An Analysis of Criminal Retrial Procedures in China

Research on the Reform of China's Public Prosecution System

Rational Thinking about Amending Criminal Procedure Law

On the Theoretical Foundation and the Reconstruction of Criminal Retrial System

Legal Restraints on Compulsory Investigative Measures and Judicial Review

Several Issues on the Reform of Criminal Procedure

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

Legal Consideration on the Criminal Retrial Procedure in China

To Provide for New Rights or To Strengthen Remedies?

The Construction of the Procedural Judicature in China's Criminal Procedure

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

On the Establishment of the Presumption of Innocence Principle and the Improvement of the Confession System.

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

On the Rationality of Quadrilateral Essentials of Crime Composition and Stick to China's Criminal Legal System