Short-term Follow-Up Effect of Total Hip Replacement in Fresh and Old Femoral Neck Fractures of Middle-Aged and Old Patients

杨柳,郭林,王文良,唐康来
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j:issn:1001-8050.2003.11.005
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the short-term follow-up cu ra tive effect of primary total hip replacement (THR) in treating fresh and old fem oral neck fractures. Methods Double follow-ups with an in terval of 13 months were performed in patients with femoral neck fractures under going THR in our department from January 1997 to October 1999. Results After a follow-up for 37-62 months (mean 44 months), we obtained f ull data of 47 patients [41-77 years old, (61.8±5.22) years old] with preoperative Harris score of 28.40±10.14 and postoperative score of 85.20±7. 91. The Harris score of patients with fresh femoral neck fractures (FFNF) incr eased from 21.60±8.73 preoperatively to 82.50±9.81 postoperatively〔at age of (63.50±5.53) years〕 and that of patients with old femoral neck fracture (O FNF) from 37.70±13.50 to 90.63±5.79, [at age of (58.90±7.81) years]. Of 47 patients, only one case had dislocation once within six weeks postoperative ly during function exercise and recovered after manual reduction. Another one wi th excellent function evaluation was given again internal fixation three years a fter THR because of femoral shaft fracture and obtained satisfactory recovery. N o complications were found in other patients. The mean Harris score in patients with OFNF was significantly higher than those with FFNF ( P 0.05). Harris pai n score was significantly high. Conclusions In the middle -aged and relatively old people with femoral neck fractures, THR has a good the rapeutic effect in short-term follow-up and markedly relieve pain in patients with OFNF. Harris score is rather low in patients with FFNF. However, a large nu mber of THR cases are needed to ascertain the present conclusion.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?