Abstract:AIM: There is a controversial argument about the choice of total hip replacement (THR) and bipolar artificial femoral head replacement (FHR) for elderly patients with femoral neck fracture. This study was designed to explore the long-term biocompatibility and functional recovery of joints in patients over 70 years with femoral neck fracture by THR and bipolar artificial FHR. METHODS: Sixty patients with femoral neck fracture over 70 years were enrolled from the First Department of Bone and Joint Surgery in the First Hospital of Jilin University from January 2002 to December 2006. There were 21 cases (8 males and 13 females) receiving THR, with a mean age of (72.1±3.5) years, and 18 of them were complicated with internal diseases. While 39 cases (16 males and 23 females) received bipolar artificial FHR, their average ages was (75.1±6.4) years, and 35 of them were complicated with internal disease. ①Choice of artificial prosthesis: Sixteen prosthesis were produced by Germany Link Company and American Zimmer Company, 44 artificial joints were offered by Beijing Mengtaiyin Medical Instrument Co., Ltd. ②All the patients were operated by senior doctors who were qualified for post technique owing to more than 10-years working experience about artificial joints. ③The mean time of follow-ups for all patients was 37 months. The difference was compared in biocompatibility between materials and host, joint function, Harris scoring, time of operation, blood loss, time of hospitalization, cost of hospitalization and adverse effect. RESULTS: ①Comparison of biocompatibility: Two revisions for abrasion of acetabular wall were carried out 5 years after bipolar artificial FHR, and there was no infection of incision, dislocation of hip joint or loose of artificial joint in other patients of these two groups. ②Comparison of adverse effect: There was one patient with complications of pain and red swelling of hip in each group. No infection occurred around the prosthesis, and these two patients recovered after symptomatic treatment. ③Comparison of follow-ups for joint function: The average Harris scores was 89.8±8.6 in THR group and 72.7±9.5 in bipolar artificial FHR group, and there were significant differences in these two groups (P < 0.05). ④There was no significant difference between two groups in the comparison of time and cost of hospitalization (P > 0.05). ⑤Comparison of operation time and blood loss: The average operation time were (150.2±24.3) minutes in THR group and (105.8±22.1) minutes in bipolar artificial FHR group, with significant differences (P < 0.05). The blood loss was (990.1±184.6) mL in THR group and (680.5±154.7) mL in bipolar artificial FHR group, with significant differences (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: With the low occurrence of biocompatibility reactions such as pain and abrasion of acetabular wall in long-term observation, and good functional recovery of joints, THR is the best treatment in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures.

Clinical study of artificial femoral head replacement and total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of 221 cases of femoral neck fracture with osteoporosis

STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF ARTIFICIAL HIP JOINT REPLACEMENT ON BLOOD VESSEL CECs, EPCs AND SERUM OSTEOCALCIN OF PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD

Clinical efficacy analysis of artificial femoral head replacement in the treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients

A Comparative Effectiveness Research on Operative Methods of Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Curative effect of artificial femoral head replacement and its effect on hip joint function and complications of senile patients with femoral intertrochanteric fracture

Hip arthroplasty in treatment of femoral neck fractures in 87 senile patients

The Clinical Study of Therapeutic Effect of Artificial Femoral HeadReplacement in the Treatment of Old Patients with IntertrochantericFemoral Fracture

Comparison of curative effect among the therapy of dynamic hip screws, proximal femoral nail and artificial femoral head replacement to treat unstable intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patient

[Mid-Term Follow-Up Study of Hip Arthroplasty for Internal Fixation Failure of Femoral Intertrochanteric Fractures in the Elderly].

Clinical observations of three kinds of arthroplasty for the treatment of femoral neck fractures in the elderly

Clinical Effects of Femoral Head Replacement for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures of the Fe-mur in the Elderly

Comparison of Results Between Total Hip Arthroplasty and Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Elderly

Study on the efficacy of total hip arthroplasty or hemiarthroplasty in treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures in elderly patients

Efficacy analysis of artificial femoral head replacement and internal fixation with PFNA in the treatment of unstable femoral intertrochanteric fracture

Carbon-coated artificial femoral head replacement for unstable and osteoporotic femoral fractures in the elderly

Comparison of total hip replacement and bipolar artificial femoral head replacement for elderly patients with femoral neck fractures

Cemented artificial femoral head arthroplasty treats elderly unstable intertrochanteric fracture

Treatment of Old Femoral Neck Fracture in the Elderly with Total Hip Arthroplasty

Artificial femoral head replacement for the treatment of comminuted intertrochanteric fracture in elderly patients

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Different Treatment Regimens in Elderly Patients with Severe Osteoporosis Intertrochanteric Fractures Elderly

Clinical analysis of bipolar femoral head replacement in treatment of unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric frac-ture of femur in 60 patients