Effects of Volume Preloading on Hemodynamics and Extravascular Lung Water in Geriatric Patients

葛宁花,丁明,薛张纲,蒋豪
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/j.issn:0254-1416.2001.08.003
2001-01-01
Abstract:Objective To assess the effects of volume preloading on hemodynamics and extravascular lung water in elderly patients undergoing elective liver cancer operation under combined epidural and general anesthesia Methods Forty ASA Ⅰ Ⅱ patients (65 72 years) scheduled for elective elective liver cancer operation under combined epidural and general anesthesia were randomly divided into two groups: volume preloding group ( group A ,n=20) and group ( group B,n=20) The patients were premedicated with intramuscular phenobarbital sodium 0 1mg and atropine 0 3mg Epidural catheter was placed at T 8 9 and 0 5% bupivacaine 4ml was given before induction of general anesthesia Anesthesia was induced with fentanyl 4μg/kg,thiopentone 5mg/kg and succinycholine 2mg/kg After tracheal intubation the patients were mechanically ventilated P ET CO 2 was maintained between 35 40mm Hg Anesthesia was maintained with inhalation of 60% N 2O, intermittent intravenous boluses of fentanyl and vecuroinum and epidural bupivacaine In group A, patients received lactated Ringer solution 20ml/kg and hydroxyethyl starch solution (HES) 10ml/kg,1 5h before induction of general anesthesia In control group, patients received lactated Ringer solution 8 10ml/kg Internal jagular vein was cannulated for CVP monitoring and thermal dilution catheter was placed via femoral artery and connected with PICCO device ECG, MAP, HR, CVP, CI, SVR, intrathoracic blood volume(ITBV) and extravascular lung water (EVLW) were continuously monitored during the operation Results Demographic data were comparable between the two groups In groups A patients received more fluid [(4266 7±764 4)ml] than those in group B [(2725 5±262 9)ml] After epidural administration of 0 5% bupivacaine 4ml, there was no significant decrease in MAP,HR and CI (P0 05) while SVR decreased significantly (P0 05) as compared with the baseline values in both groups In group A there was no significant increase in EVLW after volume preloading as compared with baseline value After induction of general anethesia there was not significant decrease in MAP,HR, and CI as compared with baseline value (P0 05) in group A; while in group B MAP, HR and CI decreased significantly (P0 05) During operation there was no significant difference in ITBV and EVLW between the two groups Conclusions Crystalloid and colloid fluid preloading can prevent hypotension associated with epidural block compared with general anesthesia in geriatric patients and is beneficial for maintaining hemodynamic stability without increasing EVLW
What problem does this paper attempt to address?