Abstract:PURPOSEHigh-sensitivity and high-resolution depth-encoding positron emission tomography (PET) detectors are required to simultaneously improve the sensitivity and spatial resolution of a PET scanner so that the quantitative accuracy of PET studies can be improved. The semi-monolithic scintillator PET detector has the advantage of measuring the depth of interaction with single-ended readout as compared to the traditional pixelated scintillator detector, and significantly reducing the edge effect that deteriorates the spatial resolution at edges of the detector as compared to the monolithic scintillator detector if a long rectangular semi-monolithic detector is used. In this work, depth-encoding PET detector modules were built by using long rectangular semi-monolithic scintillators and single-ended readout by silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) arrays. The performance of the detector modules was measured.METHODSThe rectangular semi-monolithic scintillator detector has an outside dimension of 11.6 × 37.6 × 10 mm3 and consists of 11 polished lutetium-yttrium oxyorthosilicate (LYSO) slices measuring 1 × 37.6 × 10 mm3 . The enhanced specular reflector (ESR) was glued on both cross-sectional surfaces of each crystal slice. For the face opposite to the SiPM array and the two end faces of the detectors, surface treatments with and without black paint were implemented for performance comparison. The bottom face of the semi-monolithic detector was coupled to a 4 × 12 SiPM array that was grouped along rows and columns separately into 16 signals. The four row signals were used to identify the slices, and the 12 column signals were used to estimate the y (monolithic direction) and z (depth direction) interaction positions. The detector was irradiated at multiple positions with a collimated 511 keV gamma beam. The collimated beam was obtained with electronic collimation by using a 22 Na point source and a reference detector. The estimated width of the gamma beam is around 0.5 mm. The flood histogram for crystal slices was measured by using the center of gravity (COG) method. The COG method and the squared COG method were used for y position estimation. The standard deviation of the column signals, the ratio of maximum to the sum of the column signals, and the sum of squared column signals were used for z position estimation.RESULTSAll slices were clearly resolved from the measured flood histograms for both detectors with different crystal surface treatments. The estimated y positions roughly linearly change with the true positions at the middle of the detector until ~5 mm from both ends of the detector. The y and z spatial resolutions of the detectors were estimated for all middle positions located more than 5 mm from both ends of the detector. The squared COG method provides better y position resolution than the COG method. The three z estimation methods provide similar depth of interaction (DOI) resolution. Surface treatment with black paint significantly improves both y and z position resolution but degrades the energy and timing resolution of the detectors. The average full width half maxima (FWHM) spatial resolution is improved from 1.77 to 1.07 mm in the y direction by using the squared COG method and from 2.71 to 1.55 mm in the z direction by using the standard deviation method. The slice-based average energy resolution degrades from 15.8% to 24.9%. The timing resolution of the entire detector module degrades from 596 to 788 ps.CONCLUSIONThe performance of rectangular semi-monolithic scintillator PET detectors with two different crystal surface treatments was measured. The detectors provide superior spatial resolution and depth-encoding capability and can be used to develop small animal and dedicated breast and brain PET scanners that can simultaneously achieve high spatial resolution, high sensitivity, and low cost.

Comparison of Performance of Lanthanum Bromide, Sodium Iodide and Plastic Scintillator Detectors

Performance comparison of four compact room-temperature detectors-two cadmium zinc telluride (CZT) semiconductor detectors, a LaCl/sub 3/(Ce) scintillator, and an NaI(Tl) scintillator

Comparative Study of NaI,BGO,LSO,GSO and YSO Scintillators Using Monte Carlo Simulations

Measure Pet Detector Performance with the Intrinsic Radioactivity of Scintillator

INVESTIGATION OF LSO SCINTILLATORS FOR HIGH-RESOLUTION PET DETECTORS

Performances of halide scintillators for the dosimetry based on gamma-ray spectrometry for environmental monitoring systems

Search for new scintillators by studying the fluorescence properties of powdered compounds with synchrotron radiation

MONTE CARLO CALCULATION AND COMPARISON OF GAMMA/NEUTRON DISCRIMINABILITY OF SOME SCINTILLATORS

Study on the scintillation performance of CLLB:Ce scintillator and optimization of measurement method

A Performance Comparison of Two Kinds of Liquid Scintillation Counters from PerkinElmer, Inc.

Relative sensitivity of plastic scintillator: A comparative analysis with 60Co gamma rays, deuterium-deuterium, and deuterium-tritium neutrons

Experimental Studies of the Characteristics of A Real-Time Ion Detector-Plastic Scintillator

Characterization of EJ-276D plastic scintillator and its comparison with EJ-299-33A and BC-501A

Growth and Evaluation of Improved CsI:Tl and NaI:Tl Scintillators

Performance of Linear PSD Methods on Α/γ Discrimination for LaBr3 : Ce Scintillation Detectors with Different Sampling Properties

A Comparative Study on the Scintillation Characteristics of Gd2SiO5:Ce and Lu1.2Gd0.8SiO5:Ce Scintillators

Initial Evaluation of the Performance of Novel Inorganic Scintillating Detectors for Small Animal Irradiation Dosimetry

Performance of Long Rectangular Semi‐monolithic Scintillator PET Detectors

A Compact Dual Gamma Neutron Detector Based on NaI(Tl+Li) Scintillator Readout with SiPM

Measurement of nanocomposite scintillators by terahertz time domain spectroscopy

Comparisons of Dosimetric Properties Between GD-300 Series of Radiophotoluminescent Glass Detectors and GR-200 Series of Thermoluminescent Detectors