Abstract:From a global perspective,although the protection of freedom of expression will still be a problem in many countries,the new challenge of freedom of expression in the age of Internet is that people with ability and freedom to communicate freely tend to communicate only with people they agree with.This kind of ineffective communication leads to not only some negative consequences as "debates and communication cannot help people get close to the truth," but also to some serious negative ramifications as political division and social contradiction.In 2004,Ronald Dworkin delivered his concern in his writings on political division in American democracy.He also put forward his theoretical solution —"return to the common background." However,Dworkin's solution is more like an ideal one lack of practical strategy and workable operation.This article proposes a principle of "New Public Forum" and expects to solve the problem on a systematic,strategic and operational level.The principle of traditional public forum considers its main goal as solving the dilemma between the valuable role of mass media and the right of individuals to express freely and effectively.Today we have to deal with another dilemma because whereas the internet improves people's capability of sending and receiving information and expressing their opinions,the effectiveness of communication itself is still being threatened.Cyberkans,a phenomenon of worldwide network Balkanization,is the linchpin in this dilemma.Cyberkans results from complex factors such as political and legal policies,business strategies of Internet product manufacturers and a more crucial one that ordinary people as consumers tend to choose the internet product to help them filter for favorable information and opinions.In the Internet era,people not only rely on information filtration,but also prefer and actively choose filtering tools.They are fond of "personalized" products,which inevitably lead to information "cocoon" and "Daily Me." That is why people with different values,different preferences and different interests are easily separated and divided into different groups.Furthermore,opinions and beliefs in divided groups tend to become extreme in the process of "Group Polarization," which intensifies social contradictions and affects social stability because of the lack of effective debate and communication.Malfunction of the marketplace of opinions,group polarization and tagging tendency all manifest certain kind of ineffective communication resulting from Cyberkans. There are at least two solutions for these problems.The first one is to remove all separation institutes and integrate all information into one platform.This proposal fundamentally denies the network users' choices and overthrows market mechanism in the Network Economy,that's why it can only be applied to some web sites of government and other public service departments.The second solution is to establish a new kind of "Public Forum" for effective communication meanwhile keeping commodity market of internet working by itself.This new Public Forum Doctrine includes the test of extensity,compatibility and,the most important,efficiency.Extensity Test requires the forum to reach as many opinion groups as possible.Compatibility Test requires the forum to contain as many different opinions as possible.Efficiency Test requires political debaters to follow certain kind of regulations to make sure debates are reasonable and yield reasonable results.Considering the actual situation in China,the traditional mainstream media has the responsibility and capability to become the platform of the new public forum.

The Relationship Between the Interactive Medium and Public Medium:The Case of SARS Outbreak

[Role of mass media during the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic]

Cyberkans and Ineffectvie Communication:A New Public Forum Doctrine in the Internet Era

Risk Communication on Public Emergencies in Public Health Area

Public opinion communication mechanism of public health emergencies in Weibo: take the COVID-19 epidemic as an example

Internet public opinion dissemination mechanism of COVID-19: evidence from the Shuanghuanglian event

ANALYSIS OF THE RELATED BEHAVIORAL INFLUENCING FACTORS ON THE PUBLICr HEALTH DURING SARS OUTBREAK

Discussion on the Application of Mobile Media in Public Health Emergencies

Educational Functions of Network Media Technology in Major Emergencies: A Case Study at Glasgow College, UESTC, China

Research Progresson the Influence of Social Media Communication Characteristics on Public Risk Perception in Public Health Emergencies

Risk Communication During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the Era of Social Media

How do online users perceive health risks during public health emergencies? Empirical evidence from China

According to the public crisis occurred after the authenticity of information transmission of personal and social influence

Emergency Response and Risk Communication Effects of Local Media during COVID-19 Pandemic in China: A Study Based on a Social Media Network

Asymmetry of Information and Public Reactions During the SARS Period

Social media interactions between government and the public: A Chinese case study of government WeChat official accounts on information related to COVID-19

Social media communication and public engagement in different health crisis stages: The framing of COVID-19 in Chinese official media

Utilizing social media for community risk communication in megacities: analysing the impact of WeChat group information interaction and perception on communication satisfaction during the COVID-19 pandemic in Shanghai

Digital Media’s Role in the COVID-19 Pandemic

How Does Risk-Information Communication Affect the Rebound of Online Public Opinion of Public Emergencies in China?

Strategies of the student work based on the characteristics of online public opinion in dealing with emergencies in the micro era