Comparison of two nasal packing methods following endoscopic nasal septal construction

陈福权,黄华,邱建华,乔莉,刘永收
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-8622.2003.05.012
2003-01-01
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the clinical value of Merocel surgical sponge products following endoscopic nasal septal construction. Methods: Sixty cases underwent endoscopic nasal septal construction were divided into 2 groups randomly: Merocel and Vaseline gauze group, which received nasal packing with Merocel and Vaseline gauze after operation respectively. Reaction and complication of nasal packing of two groups were compared. Results: Swollen of outer nose and headache after packing was slighter in Merocel group than that in Vaseline gauze group. There was no significant difference in bleeding between the two groups. Endoscopic examination showed slighter swollen of nasal mucosa, effusion from the wound and nasal pseudomenbrane in Merocel group than that in Vaseline gauze group after removing packing material. There were 3 cases of hematoma of nasal septum in Merocel group and 1 in Vaseline gauze group ( P 0.05). Conclusion: Merocel nasal packing following endoscopic nasal septal construction is a safe, reliable and effective procedure that significantly relieves patient's discomfort. Merocel nasal packing is a valid alternative to Vaseline gauze packing following nasal septal surgery.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?