Meta analysis of therapy effect of trans-septal suturing technique versus nasal packing in septoplasty

DAI Meng-yuan,CHEN Shi-ming,TAO Ze-zhang,CHEN Chen,LI Man
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-0785.2013.09.0113
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective To systematically assess the efficacy and safety of suturing techniques and nasal packing after septoplasty.Methods Search for RCTs in databases such as The Cochrane Library,PubMed,EMbase,Hownet,Weipu and Wanfang Data regarding to suturing techniques and nasal packing after septoplasty.At the same time,the references were screened.Researchers went through strict evaluation and extraction against reference quality,and only the qualified references underwent Meta-analysis with Review Manager 5.1.Results A total of 10 studies with 1578 patients were included,with 798 individuals in non-packing group and 780 individuals in packing group.Meta-analysis result implied that postoperative pain and local infection risk were significantly lower in the non-packing group than packing group[OR=0.11,95% CI(0.01,0.89),P<0.01].Conventional packing and trans-septal suturing technique appear to be equivalent with regard to postoperative haemorrhage risk,mucosal adhesions,septal haematoma and septal perforation.Conclusion The advantage of suturing techniques over conventional packing in septoplasty is obvious with less complication,and the use of suturing techniques as a first line intervention is becoming advisable.For the quality and quantity limitation of the included studies,this conclusion needs to be proved by performing more high quality RCTs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?