Comparative observation on the clinical usability of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam and Merocel during functional endoscopic septoplasty

Cheng LU,Youxiang MA,Baocheng DONG,Daoxing ZHANG

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1007-4856.2013.03.007

2013-01-01

Abstract: Objective To observe the clinical usability of biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) and Merocel for nasal packing during functional endoscopic septoplasty. Methods Included in this study were 160 cases undergone functional endoscopic septoplasty to receive nasal packing with different packing materials. They were randomly divided into two groups, with 80 patients in each group, and were packed with biodegradable synthetic polyurethane foam (NasoPore) for one group and with Merocel for the other group. Then, a comparative observation was made between these two groups to evaluate differences in uncomfortable sensation in local region, associated symptoms following the packing material withdrawn, injury healing situation and complications occurred during a longer post-operative period. Results There were no significant differences in the severity of general symptoms, such as local pain, pressure sensation, obstructive felling, lacrimation, sneezing and fever between these two groups (P>0.05). The quantity of nose bleeding and the speed of mucosa healing were both significantly superior for cases in NasoPore group to that in Merocel group once the packing material withdrawn postoperatively (P<0.05), but no significant differences were present in the long-term effect between these two groups as seen during the following up period lasted for 4 weeks postoperatively (P>0.05). Conclusion Biodegradable NasoPore holds the same clinical usability as that of Merocel. However, NasoPore can replace Merocel in clinical practice because it is a new type of biodegradable synthetic material so as to avoid painful feeling and bleeding when withdrawing nose packing material.