Abstract:Price promotion is an effective way to capture market share, as consumer sensitivity to price is universal. Yet, consumer satisfaction with services‐such as logistics‐plays a critical role. Deep price discounts can indeed spike demand, but they can also congest systems, thus prolonging delivery times and diminishing consumer satisfaction. Despite observed significant effects of logistics capacity on consumer and firm payoffs in logistics systems in recent years, economic and operational analysis of these effects remains under explored. This study theoretically examines the influence of logistics capacity on competition between two firms using a refined Hotelling model that incorporates system congestion via a BPR‐type congestion function. Our primary findings include: First, the possibility of multiple equilibria emerges with intermediate product values, fueled by either unilateral price reductions to seize greater market share or price increases to enhance marginal benefits. Moreover, a firm with superior logistics capacity may not always set higher prices at equilibrium. Second, we show that equilibrium pricing exhibits a non‐monotonic relationship with logistics capacity and market size. Lastly, we scrutinize firms' long‐term strategic reactions to changes in logistics capacity and the implications of marginal capacity costs, symmetric or otherwise. Our findings provide the following insights. We caution that the equilibrium pricing strategy is ambiguous when the product value is not extreme because both firms are more likely to engage in random price wars. Intriguingly, while augmenting logistics capacity might elevate service satisfaction, it could paradoxically reduce firm revenue or consumer surplus. Our analysis also indicates that higher marginal capacity costs could, counter intuitively, benefit firms or consumers.

Strategic Capacity Competition and Overcapacity in Shipping

Carrier Profitability Influenced by Large Containerships

Game-Theoretical Models for Competition Analysis in A New Emerging Liner Container Shipping Market

Improving resilience via capacity allocation and strategic pricing: Co-opetition in a shipping supply chain

Multidimensional Container Shipping Alliance Decisions among Competitors: Impact of Capacity Constraints and Market Competition

Aymelek, Murat and Boulougouris, Evangelos and Turan, Osman (2016) A game theory competition analysis of quadropolistic liner container shipping market. In: Proceedings of International Association of Maritime Economists (IAME)

Independence or alliance? Shipping lines' capacity configuration and strategies analysis facing market disturbance risk

On Capacity Allocation Model in Competitive Air Cargo Industry with Spot and Forward Markets

A Game-Theoretical Approach for Modeling Competitions in a Maritime Supply Chain

Structural Analysis of Shipping Fleet Capacity

A Game-Theoretical Model of Port Competition on Intermodal Network and Pricing Strategy

Cooperation and Investment Decisions of One Shipping Liner to Multiple Ports under Differential Pricing

Study of the Risk and Cooperation of Cargo Owners Fleets Development Based on Game Theory

Dynamic Pricing and Competition of Container Liner Shipping Services in a Duopoly Spot Market

Analysis model of supply, demand and price of container shipping market

Pricing and Allotment in A Sea-Cargo Supply Chain with Reference Effect: A Dynamic Game Approach

Impact of Logistics Capacity on Duopoly Competition: Implications for Firms and Consumers

Capacity prioritization allocation and credit financing option in shipping freight forwarding market

Supplier Behavior in Capacity Investment Competition: an Experimental Study

Product transportation strategy in the presence of limited shipment capacity and purchase timing

Strategic equilibrium model of carrier and shipper for container transportation network: A Bi-level competitive approach