Abstract:Purpose - Empty container repositioning is an important issue in the liner shipping industry. Generally stated, two groups of mathematical models have been proposed to tackle this issue. The first group aims to derive time-dependent origin-destination matrices that specify the number of empty containers to be repositioned at a decision epoch; the second group aims to develop effective state-feedback control policies consisting of dynamic decision-making rules. There is, however, a lack of research into the comparison of these two groups, especially with regard to realistic cases subject to uncertainties. The purpose of this paper is to evaluate and compare the performances of some typical repositioning policies from these two groups and to shed light on their relative merits and suitability in various realistic scenarios.Design/methodology/approach - Based on a literature review, the paper classifies the current empty container repositioning policies into two categories: origin-destination (OD) based solutions and state-based dynamic rules. Typical policies are selected from these two categories and then evaluated using a simulation tool. A range of scenarios are designed based on realistic cases considering the stochastic and dynamic nature of liner services. A comprehensive set of simulation experiments are conducted and analysed; and the relative merits and suitability of the repositioning policies are identified.Findings - Through a carefully designed comparative study, several research findings are obtained with regard to how the performances of different types of empty container repositioning policies are affected by various factors such as structure of service route, uncertainty of daily demands, and parametric optimisation methods.Originality/value - The study makes a good attempt to analyse the suitability of different empty container repositioning policies in different scenarios. This is an area that has lacked investigation. The research findings can help shipping companies and other relevant stakeholders better understand the relative merits of different empty container repositioning policies and better tackle the challenges in operating the container shipping system.

Pricing and Competition in a Shipping Market with Waste Shipments and Empty Container Repositioning

Carrier Profitability Influenced by Large Containerships

Modeling Incentive Strategies for Landside Integration in Multimodal Transport Chains

Pricing and Competition in a Transportation Market with Empty Equipment Repositioning

Pricing Competition for Ocean Transportation with Heterogeneous Carriers and Empty Container Repositioning

A Study on A Transportation Market with Empty Equipment Repositioning

Game-Theoretical Models for Competition Analysis in A New Emerging Liner Container Shipping Market

Dynamic Pricing and Competition of Container Liner Shipping Services in a Duopoly Spot Market

Cost Optimization of Empty Shipping Container Allocation Based on Integer Programming

A Game-Theoretical Model of Port Competition on Intermodal Network and Pricing Strategy

Analysis model of supply, demand and price of container shipping market

Empty Container Exchange among Liner Carriers

Empty Container Repositioning with Consideration of Free Detention Time and Liner Carrier Cooperation.

Contracting in Ocean Transportation with Empty Container Repositioning under Asymmetric Information

Leasing or Repositioning Empty Containers? Determining the Time-Varying Guide Leasing Prices for Decision Making

A pricing model for the container liner shipping based on price matching policies

Optimal Unloading and Storage Pricing for Inbound Containers

A Multi-Stage Approach for Empty Container Repositioning under Coordination among Liner Carriers

Assessment Of Empty Container Repositioning Policies In Maritime Transport

Monopoly in the container shipping market: an econometric approach

Shipping Supply Chain Financing Model under Empty Container Repositioning:Guarantee Vs. Delayed Payment