The Evolution of the CPC's Conception of Association and Regulation of Social Organizations in China

Jun Yu,Henry Hailong Jia,Danqiu Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-018-9588-3

2018-01-01

International Journal for the Semiotics of Law

Abstract:Freedom of association and all institutions coming with it have not been accepted by the Chinese government. Instead, Chinese social organization administration is based upon the concept of association held by the Communist Party of China (CPC). The Chinese government had adopted a total control model of social organization administration in the era of totalitarianism before the Opening-up and Reform, leaving almost no room for social organizations to survive, because the CPC had regarded social organizations as revolutionary and deconstructive. The Chinese has adopted a graduated control system to administrate social organizations in the era of authoritarianism after the Opening-up and Reform, treating social organizations differently according to their threats to the ruling order and their utilities for economic development, because the CPC has viewed social organizations as a challenging but auxiliary power. The on-going innovation of registration and administration of social organizations is not a return to international standard regarding social organization administration in China, but only partial reform of the graduate control system still based upon the CPC's conception of association as challenging but auxiliary. Social organizations capable of providing public goods in areas of economic development and social services are given more favorable treatment by the government while political and religious organizations are still tightly controlled by the government.