Abstract:Summary form only given. The evaluation of the performance of R&D in China began in the 1950s, and a number of relative theories, methods and tools have been developed in the past decades. Especially, the rising costs of R&D and the increasing dependence of companies on technology for competitive advantage are causing both external investors and managers to identify the outcomes of R&D activities. As a result, the evaluation and measurement on the R&D performance by which to check the productivity, impacts and efficiency of R&D activities has became more and more important since the 1990s. The R&D activities in China involve scientific explorations, programs and projects in firms, universities and public or private research organizations. The universities and research organizations of China play a more important role than firms in R&D, especially in the field of both basic science research and applied research. It is very important to evaluate the R&D performance of universities and research organizations in China. Many popular methods and tools, such as peer review, econometrics, scientometrics, AHP, integrated indicators, are widely used in the evaluation practice, notwithstanding their own problems or limitations. It is noticeable that the internal performance of organizations' R&D activities, such as papers published, designs produced, patents, as well as R&D/sales are paid more addition to, and more relative evaluation methods are developed and adopted, while the external impacts of R&D are comparatively ignored. Generally speaking, the current evaluation work has had less of an impact and role that they deserve. This article gives a systemic summary and analysis on the current evaluation theories and methods for R&D performance, and in the meanwhile, their limitations and drawbacks are also pointed out. Based on the analysis of the characteristics and importance of the R&D activities in the coming knowledge-based economy, some promising theories and approaches with high operability and practicability are introduced by which to evaluate the R&D performance effectively.

The Performance of China'S Biomedical Innovation: A Scientometric Analysis

Internationalization And Innovation: A Bibliometric Analysis

International Performance of Chinese Institutes in Different Disciplines——A Bibliometric View

Innovation Map of China: a Scientometrics Based Quantitative Research on the Development of Innovation Management in China

Evaluation of China's Innovation Performance and Its Implications

The evolution of Chinese technological and innovational policies and the empirical research on the performance(1978-2006)

A Study of China's Scientific & Technological Innovations in Industries and her International Competitiveness

The Key Factors of Successful Innovation in China

The dynamics of the studies of China’s science, technology and innovation (STI): a bibliometric analysis of an emerging field

Comparative Study and Suggestions on Scientific and Technological Innovation of China and the United States

The Performance And Trend Of China'S Academic Disciplines From 2006 To 2014

Evaluating R&D Effectiveness: a Study on Chinese Practice and Trend

Understanding Chinese Science: New Scientometric Perspectives

China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory

Quantitative evaluation of the medicine innovation policy in China: based on the PMC-Index model

China's 40-year road to innovation

Evaluation on China's Capacity of Innovation in Science in the Past Ten Years

In Pursuit Of Technological Innovation China'S Science And Technology Policies And Financial And Fiscal Incentives

[Scientific and Technological Innovation and Achievement Transformation Promote the Medical Development].

Research Performance of Chinese Research Universities:A Scientometric Study

How Sino-Foreign Cooperation Networks Affect Innovation Performance of Chinese Enterprises? Evidence From Biomedical Industry