Abstract:Abstract Background In patients with complex CAD, the presence of left main (LM) disease is an important prognostic factor in assessing the risk balance between PCI and CABG. Functional assessment has become standard of care to evaluate the significance of coronary stenosis and to justify the performance of PCI in the contemporary practice. FFRCT is a well-established method based on 3D reconstruction of coronary artery derived from CCTA. The Murray law-based quantitative flow reserve (μQFR) is a novel computational method of invasive angiography relying on a single angiographic view that takes into account side branches diameters to compute fractal flow division. The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate in patients with complex CAD the feasibility of μQFR in LM bifurcation and its diagnostic concordance with FFRCT. The impact of the optimal viewing angle defined by CCTA on the physiological assessment of the LM bifurcation using a single angiographic view was also evaluated. Methods In 299 consecutive patients with 3-vessel disease with or without LM coronary artery disease, up to 3 analyzable fluoroscopic projections per patient were analysed with μQFR retrospectively. FFRCT and μQFR were measured at 3 fiducial landmark points: i) point of LM bifurcation (POB); ii) proximal LAD 10 mm distal to POB; ii) proximal LCX 10 mm distal to POB. CCTA-based “optimal viewing angle” of LM bifurcation are computed by creating a 3-point closed spline involving the LM, LAD, and LCX at 5mm from the POB and subsequently by reconstructing the “en face” fluoroscopic viewing angle of the spline. The en face viewing angle provides an optimal assessment of the bifurcation geometry [1]. In terms of Rx gantry angulation, the closest angiographic projection to the optimal viewing angle derived from CCTA was defined as the “best fluoroscopic projection” for each patient. Results In 299 patients, 793 projections were analysed with μQFR and compared to FFRCT. Single view μQFR was analyzable in 100%. Correlation and agreement between μQFR and FFRCT for 793 projections in 299 patients are shown in Figure 1A, 2A. The Spearman's correlation coefficient showed moderate correlations at POB (r=0.481, p<0.001) and LCX (r=0.584, p<0.001), and strong correlation at LAD (r=0.642, p<0.001). Correlation and agreement between μQFR and FFRCT for best projections from each patient are shown in Figure 1B, 2B. Correlations were improved in the best projections with the following Spearman's correlation coefficient: at POB (r=0.522, p<0.001), LCX (r=0.622, p<0.001), and LAD (r=0.695, p<0.001). Conclusion Computation of μQFR from a single angiographic view has a high feasibility. Tailored optimal fluoroscopic view is essential for the physiological assessment of the LM bifurcation using a single angiographic view. Evaluation of diagnostic accuracy of μQFR warrants further analysis of the LMCAD after prospective planning of the optimal fluoroscopic view based on the selection of the best CCTA 3D view. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Usefulness of the Finet Law to Guide Stent Size Selection in Ostial Left Main Stenting: Comparison with Standard Angiographic Estimation

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Prognostic Implications of Quantitative Flow Ratio and Optical Coherence Tomography-Guided Neointimal Characteristics in Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for In-Stent Restenosis

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Morphological Correlation between the Diameters of the Left Main Coronary Artery and its Branches Measured by QCA and Derived by Finet’s Law

Physiology- or Imaging-Guided Strategies for Intermediate Coronary Stenosis.

Clinical Outcomes of Deferred Lesions with Angiographically Insignificant Stenosis but Low Fractional Flow Reserve.

Three-year Clinical Impact of Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio and OCT- or FFR-Guidance in Angiographically Intermediate Coronary Lesions

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Quantitative Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography for the Functional Assessment of Mild-to-moderate Coronary Stenoses: Comparison with Fractional Flow Reserve

Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography

Procedural Characteristics of Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Their Clinical Implications

Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio to Assess Left Main Bifurcation Stenosis: Selecting the Angiographic Projection Matters.

Optical Flow Ratio From Co-Registration of Coronary Angiography and Optical Coherence Tomography for Predicting Stenting Result and Physiological Significance of Residual Disease

Feasibility of Quantitative Flow Ratio Virtual Stenting for Guidance of Serial Coronary Lesions Intervention

Murray Law-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessment of Left Main Bifurcation Derived from a Single Fluoroscopic Angiographic View As Compared to FFRCT

Comparison of One-Year Clinical Outcomes Between Intravascular Ultrasound-Guided Versus Angiography-Guided Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents for Left Main Lesions: A Single-Center Analysis of A 1,016-Patient Cohort

Comparison of Stent Expansion Using a Volumetric Versus the Conventional Method Through Optical Coherence Tomography in an All-Comers Population

Dynamic assessment of the left main-left circumflex bending angle: Implications for ostial left circumflex artery in-stent restenosis after successful two-stent PCI