Abstract:Background: Discordance between coronary angiographic findings and invasive functional significance is well-established. Yet, the prevalence of this mismatch in an era increasingly utilizing invasive functional assessments, such as fractional flow reserve (FFR), remains unclear. This study examines the extent of such discrepancies in current clinical practice. Methods: This single-center prospective registry included consecutive patients with chronic coronary syndrome (CCS) who underwent elective coronary angiography, with or without revascularization. Coronary angiograms deemed not requiring FFR due to clear anatomical distinctions, either anatomically severe indicating a need for revascularization or mild suggesting no need for intervention, were selected for evaluation. These were then subjected to post-hoc analysis by three independent operators who were blinded to the definitive treatment strategies. Importantly, the post-hoc analysis was conducted in two distinct phases: firstly, a re-evaluation of coronary stenosis, and secondly, a separate functional assessment, each carried out independently. Coronary stenosis severity was assessed visually, while functional relevance was determined by quantitative flow ratio (QFR), calculated using a computational fluid dynamics algorithm applied to angiographic images. Analysis focused on discrepancies between QFR-based functional indications and revascularization strategies actually performed. Results: In 191 patients, 488 vessels were analyzed. Average diameter stenosis (DS) was 37 ± 34%, and QFR was 0.87 ± 0.15, demonstrating a moderate correlation ( r = −0.84; 95% CI: −0.86 to −0.81, p < 0.01). Agreement with QFR at conventional anatomical cutoffs was 88% for 50% DS and 91% for 70% DS. Mismatches between revascularization decisions and QFR indications occurred in 10% of cases. Discrepancies were more frequent in the left anterior descending artery (14%) compared to the left circumflex (6%) and the right coronary artery (9%; p = 0.07). Conclusion: In a cardiac-center where FFR utilization is high, discordance between coronary angiography and functional significance persists, even when operators are confident in their decisions not to use functional interrogation. This gap, most evident in the left anterior descending artery, highlights the potential need for integrated angiography-based functional assessments to refine revascularization decisions in CCS.

Quantitative angiography and optical coherence tomography for the functional assessment of nonobstructive coronary stenoses: comparison with fractional flow reserve.

Diagnostic Performance of Immediate Angiography Derived Quantitative Flow Ratio in Patients after Second Generation Drug Eluting Stent and Bioresorable Scaffold Implantation

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis

Comparison of Diagnostic Accuracy of Immediate Angiography Derived Residual Quantitative Flow Ratio after Bioresorbable Scaffold and Drug Eluting Stent Implantation

Diagnostic Performance of Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve for Functional Evaluation of Coronary Artery Stenosis.

Effect of lesion characteristics on diagnostic performance of CT-derived fractional flow reserve: exploring the indications for application based on CT-FFR CHINA trial (Preprint)

Evaluation of Fractional Flow Reserve in Patients with Stable Angina: Can CT Compete with Angiography?

A comparative study of optimization algorithm FFR-CT and invasive FFR

Diagnostic Performance of Computational Fluid Dynamics (Cfd)-Based Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) Derived from Coronary Computed Tomographic Angiography (CCTA) for Assessing Functional Severity of Coronary Lesions

Discordance Between Angiographic Assessment and Fractional Flow Reserve or Intravascular Ultrasound in Intermediate Coronary Lesions: A Post-hoc Analysis of the FLAVOUR Trial.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Severity.

Diagnostic Performance of AccuFFRangio in the Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Compared with Pressure Wire-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Diagnostic Accuracy of Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve

Usefulness of Combined Intravascular Ultrasound Parameters to Predict Functional Significance of Coronary Artery Stenosis and Determinants of Mismatch

Operator decision-making in angiography-only guided revascularization for lesions not indicated for FFR: a QFR-based functional assessment in chronic coronary syndrome

Diagnostic Accuracy of Angiography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio Measurements for Online Assessment of Coronary Stenosis

Diagnostic accuracy and reproducibility of optical flow ratio for functional evaluation of coronary stenosis in a prospective series

TCT-40 Diagnostic Accuracy of Intracoronary Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Quantitative Flow Ratio for Assessment of Coronary Stenosis

[Association Between Fractional Flow Reserve and Quantitative Coronary Angiography Parameters in Intermediate Coronary Artery Stenosis].

Acetaldehyde increases the activity and gene expression of urokinase type plasminogen activator in a hepatic stellate cell line.

Accuracy and reproducibility of fast fractional flow reserve computation from invasive coronary angiography