Diagnostic Performance of AccuFFRangio in the Functional Assessment of Coronary Stenosis Compared with Pressure Wire-Derived Fractional Flow Reserve.

Jun Jiang,Lijiang Tang,Changqing Du,Xiaochang Leng,Jingsong He,Yumeng Hu,Liang Dong,Yong Sun,Changling Li,Jianping Xiang,Jian'an Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-463
2021-01-01
Quantitative Imaging in Medicine and Surgery
Abstract:BACKGROUND:Non-invasive fractional flow reserve (FFR) has been increasingly used in the clinical workflow to assist clinical decision-making for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This clinical study evaluates the diagnostic accuracy of coronary stenosis assessed by a non-invasive FFR analysis method (termed AccuFFRangio) based on invasive coronary angiography (ICA). It is a blinded, self-controlled, retrospective, and dual-center clinical investigation study.METHODS:Coronary angiography data and the related information of 320 patients with 320 vessels were collected, and AccuFFRangio was used to assess the FFR for these patients. Compared with the wire-measured FFR values, we evaluated AccuFFRangio performance by its accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV).RESULTS:The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for AccuFFRangio in identifying hemodynamically significant coronary stenosis were 93.3%, 92.6%, 93.5%, 84.3%, and 97.1%, respectively. The direct correlation between computed AccuFFRangio and measured FFR was 0.812 (P<0.001), and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) value of AccuFFRangio was 0.96.CONCLUSIONS:This clinical study demonstrates the efficiency and accuracy of AccuFFRangio for clinical implementation when using invasive wire-measured FFR as a reference. Further validation is required in a large prospective multicenter study.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?