Abstract:Background Through the development of CT equipment and proper preparation before CT scanning, the accuracy of Coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA) diagnosis of ischemic heart disease (IHD) is improving, and the role of CCTA in treatment decision is gradually expanding. The latest guidelines recommend CCTA as Class IIa to evaluate stent patency and native vessels in patients with chronic coronary disease. However, diagnostic performance of CCTA to evaluate stent patency in patients who underwent coronary stent was not clarified, respectively the role of CCTA in the evaluation of IHD in native coronary artery was established.. Purpose In the present study, we evaluate the agreement between CCTA and CAG in assessing stent patency in patients with de novo ischemic chest pain who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and evaluated which factors contribute to the differences. Methods From January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2020, we analyzed 845 patients who underwent new CCTA and CAG sequentially for the evaluation of chest pain previously underwent PCI. In CAG and CCTA, ISR is equally defined as a stenosis greater than 50% of the vessel diameter of within the stented segment or its edge (5-mm segments adjacent to the stent). The degree of In-stent restenosis was analyzed by an independently by quantitative coronary angiography (QCA). Results A total of 208 stents were analyzed, the pooled sensitivity and specificity for CCTA on the diagnosis of ISR were 0.78 (0.65-0.89) and 0.93 (0.88-0.96), respectively. LR+ and LR- were 11.19 (6.22-20.15) and 0.23 (0.14-0.39). As a result of analyzing the ISR diagnostic agreement of CCTA by dividing into ACS and CCD group, the agreement of CCTA for ISR diagnosis was relatively low in the ACS group (Sensitivity 0.69 (0.48-0.86) vs. 0.88 (0.69-0.97), specificity 0.92 (0.84-0.97) vs. 0.94 (0.86-0.98), LR+ 9 (4-20.24) vs. 13.9 (5.88-32.88), LR- 0.33 (0.19-0.6) vs. 0.13 (0.04-0.37)) (Table 1). As a result of analyzing related factors in cases of discrepancy in ISR diagnosis, the degree of stenosis in both ACS and CCD groups was mostly intermediate stenosis, which often required additional clinical evaluation (Figure 1). Conclusion When new ischemic chest pain occurred in a patient who previously underwent PCI, the diagnostic accuracy of ISR by CCTA differed depending on the patient's IHD category. In the CCD group, the diagnostic usefulness of CCTA was comparable both native vessels and ISR, but not in the ACS group. As majority of ISR diagnostic discrepancies were in intermediate lesions, even in the ACS group, CCTA may be considered as a diagnostic tool.

Stent sizing by coronary CT angiography compared with optical coherence tomography

In Vivo Calcium Detection by Comparing Optical Coherence Tomography, Intravascular Ultrasound, and Angiography.

Agreement and reproducibility between 3DStent vs. Optical Coherence Tomography for evaluation of stent area and diameter

Usefulness of the Finet Law to Guide Stent Size Selection in Ostial Left Main Stenting: Comparison with Standard Angiographic Estimation

Validation of Hemodynamic Stress Calculation in Coronary Computed Tomography Angiography Versus Intravascular Ultrasound

Novel Predictors of Stent Under‐expansion Regarding Calcified Coronary Lesions Assessed by Optical Coherence Tomography

Evaluating small coronary stents with dual-source photon-counting computed tomography: effect of different scan modes on image quality and performance in a phantom

Usefulness of Optical Coherence Tomography with Angiographic Coregistration in the Guidance of Coronary Stent Implantation

Comparison of Stent Expansion Using a Volumetric Versus the Conventional Method Through Optical Coherence Tomography in an All-Comers Population

Quantification of Coronary Artery Stenosis in Very-High-Risk Patients Using Ultra-High Resolution Spectral Photon-Counting CT

Diagnostic performance of coronary computed tomography angiography for coronary in-stent re-stenosis

Stent detection with very thick tissue coverage in intravascular OCT

[Examination of accuracy and factors influencing optical coherence tomography(OCT)measurements]

Diagnostic performance of CCTA and CTP imaging for clinically suspected in-stent restenosis: A meta-analysis

Comprehensive assessment of coronary artery stenoses: computed tomography coronary angiography versus conventional coronary angiography and correlation with fractional flow …

Optical coherence tomography-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

In Vivo Evaluation of Stent Patency by 64-Slice Multidetector CT Coronary Angiography: Shall We Do It or Not?

Identification of the Type of Stent with Three-Dimensional Optical Coherence Tomography: the SPQR Study

Clinical Significance of Optical Coherence Tomography–Guided Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for In‐Stent Restenosis Within Drug‐Eluting Stents: Impact on Patient Outcomes

Coronary bypass surgery guided by computed tomography in a low-risk population

Optical coherence tomography to evaluate coronary stent implantation and complications