Abstract:Some studies provide evidence that humans could actively exploit the alleged technological advantages of autonomous vehicles (AVs). This implies that humans may tend to interact differently with AVs as compared to human driven vehicles (HVs) with the knowledge that AVs are programmed to be risk-averse. Hence, it is important to investigate how humans interact with AVs in complex traffic situations. Here, we investigated whether participants would value interactions with AVs differently compared to HVs, and if these differences can be characterized on the behavioral and brain-level. We presented participants with a cover story while recording whole-head brain activity using fNIRS that they were driving under time pressure through urban traffic in the presence of other HVs and AVs. Moreover, the AVs were programmed defensively to avoid collisions and had faster braking reaction times than HVs. Participants would receive a monetary reward if they managed to finish the driving block within a given time-limit without risky driving maneuvers. During the drive, participants were repeatedly confronted with left-lane turning situations at unsignalized intersections. They had to stop and find a gap to turn in front of an oncoming stream of vehicles consisting of HVs and AVs. While the behavioral results did not show any significant difference between the safety margin used during the turning maneuvers with respect to AVs or HVs, participants tended to be more certain in their decision-making process while turning in front of AVs as reflected by the smaller variance in the gap size acceptance as compared to HVs. Importantly, using a multivariate logistic regression approach, we were able to predict whether the participants decided to turn in front of HVs or AVs from whole-head fNIRS in the decision-making phase for every participant (mean accuracy = 67.2%, SD = 5%). Channel-wise univariate fNIRS analysis revealed increased brain activation differences for turning in front of AVs compared to HVs in brain areas that represent the valuation of actions taken during decision-making. The insights provided here may be useful for the development of control systems to assess interactions in future mixed traffic environments involving AVs and HVs.

Influence Analysis of Autonomous Cars’ Cut-In Behavior on Human Drivers in a Driving Simulator

Influence of Cut-In Maneuvers for an Autonomous Car on Surrounding Drivers: Experiment and Analysis

How Far are Autonomous Vehicles from Driving in Real Traffic? The Adaptability Analysis of Autonomous Vehicles to Cut-in Scenarios in China

Brain-Inspired Modeling and Decision-Making for Human-Like Autonomous Driving in Mixed Traffic Environment

Brain-Inspired Modelling and Decision-making for Human-Like Autonomous Driving in Mixed Traffic Environment

Analysis of Driver Response Based on Natural Sensors and Driving Dataset

Analyze Drivers' Intervention Behavior During Autonomous Driving -- A VR-incorporated Approach

Is the cut-in behavior in china dangerous? Research and analysis based on Chinese driving behavior characteristics in highway

Analysis of Cut-in Behavior Based on Naturalistic Driving Data.

Investigating Differences in Behavior and Brain in Human-Human and Human-Autonomous Vehicle Interactions in Time-Critical Situations

Autonomous Vehicles’ Car-Following Drivability Evaluation Based on Driving Behavior Spectrum Reference Model

Shaping driver-vehicle interaction in autonomous vehicles: How the new in-vehicle systems match the human needs

Greater prosociality toward other human drivers than autonomous vehicles: Human drivers' discriminatory behavior in mixed traffic

Risk-Taking Driving Behavior in Interacting With an Autonomous Vehicle at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections

An Optimal Control Framework for Influencing Human Driving Behavior in Mixed-Autonomy Traffic

Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform

Rear-End Collision Risk Analysis for Autonomous Driving

Socially-Compatible Behavior Design of Autonomous Vehicles with Verification on Real Human Data.

Energy and Environmental Implications of Automated Vehicles under Mixed Autonomy Traffic Environment

Field Experiments on Longitudinal Characteristics of Human Driver Behavior Following an Autonomous Vehicle

Characterizing Behavioral Differences and Adaptations of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers at Unsignalized Intersections: Insights from Waymo and Lyft Open Datasets