In the driver's mind: modeling the dynamics of human overtaking decisions in interactions with oncoming automated vehicles

Samir H.A. Mohammad,Haneen Farah,Arkady Zgonnikov

2024-03-29

Abstract:Understanding human behavior in overtaking scenarios is crucial for enhancing road safety in mixed traffic with automated vehicles (AVs). Computational models of behavior play a pivotal role in advancing this understanding, as they can provide insight into human behavior generalizing beyond empirical studies. However, existing studies and models of human overtaking behavior have mostly focused on scenarios with simplistic, constant-speed dynamics of oncoming vehicles, disregarding the potential of AVs to proactively influence the decision-making process of the human drivers via implicit communication. Furthermore, so far it remained unknown whether overtaking decisions of human drivers are affected by whether they are interacting with an AV or a human-driven vehicle (HDV). To address these gaps, we conducted a "reverse Wizard-of-Oz" driving simulator experiment with 30 participants who repeatedly interacted with oncoming AVs and HDVs, measuring the drivers' gap acceptance decisions and response times. The oncoming vehicles featured time-varying dynamics designed to influence the overtaking decisions of the participants by briefly decelerating and then recovering to their initial speed. We found that participants did not alter their overtaking behavior when interacting with oncoming AVs compared to HDVs. Furthermore, we did not find any evidence of brief decelerations of the oncoming vehicle affecting the decisions or response times of the participants. Cognitive modeling of the obtained data revealed that a generalized drift-diffusion model with dynamic drift rate and velocity-dependent decision bias best explained the gap acceptance outcomes and response times observed in the experiment. Overall, our findings highlight the potential of cognitive models for further advancing the ongoing development of safer interactions between human drivers and AVs during overtaking maneuvers.

Neurons and Cognition

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper focuses on the dynamic model of human overtaking decision making in mixed traffic scenarios with autonomous vehicles (AVs) and human-driven vehicles (HDVs). Existing research mainly focuses on overtaking behaviors with static or simple dynamic oncoming vehicles, neglecting the potential influence of AVs on human driver decision making through implicit communication. Additionally, it is currently unclear whether human driver overtaking decisions differ when interacting with AVs or HDVs.

To fill these research gaps, researchers conducted a simulated driving experiment, where 30 participants interacted repeatedly with dynamically changing AVs and HDVs, measuring their overtaking decisions and reaction times. In the experiment, oncoming vehicles briefly decelerated and then resumed their original speed to influence participants' decisions. The results revealed that participants' overtaking behaviors when interacting with AVs did not significantly differ from those when interacting with HDVs, and there was no evidence that the brief deceleration of the oncoming vehicles affected participants' decisions or reaction times.

By modeling the data with cognitive factors, the researchers found that a general drift-diffusion model with dynamic drift rates and speed dependency best explained the observed overtaking decision outcomes and reaction times in the experiment. These findings highlight the importance of cognitive models in further enhancing the safety interaction between human drivers and AVs, especially in overtaking maneuvers.

Overall, this paper aims to understand human decision-making behavior in dynamic overtaking situations through cognitive process modeling, promoting road safety and the development of autonomous driving technology. The experimental results demonstrate that although AVs can adopt dynamic strategies, their influence on human overtaking behavior is not significant, and drivers' decision-making behaviors remain consistent when interacting with AVs or HDVs. This provides valuable information for designing safer autonomous driving systems in the future.