Julian F. Schumann,Aravinda Ramakrishnan Srinivasan,Jens Kober,Gustav Markkula,Arkady Zgonnikov
Abstract:The development of automated vehicles has the potential to revolutionize transportation, but they are currently unable to ensure a safe and time-efficient driving style. Reliable models predicting human behavior are essential for overcoming this issue. While data-driven models are commonly used to this end, they can be vulnerable in safety-critical edge cases. This has led to an interest in models incorporating cognitive theory, but as such models are commonly developed for explanatory purposes, this approach's effectiveness in behavior prediction has remained largely untested so far. In this article, we investigate the usefulness of the \emph{Commotions} model -- a novel cognitively plausible model incorporating the latest theories of human perception, decision-making, and motor control -- for predicting human behavior in gap acceptance scenarios, which entail many important traffic interactions such as lane changes and intersections. We show that this model can compete with or even outperform well-established data-driven prediction models across several naturalistic datasets. These results demonstrate the promise of incorporating cognitive theory in behavior prediction models for automated vehicles.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problems does this paper attempt to solve?
This paper aims to address the key challenges in traffic behavior prediction for autonomous vehicles. Specifically, although autonomous vehicles have the potential to revolutionize transportation, currently they are still unable to ensure a safe and efficient driving style. To overcome this problem, a reliable model for predicting human behavior is essential.
Most of the current models for predicting human behavior are mainly data - driven methods, which may be unreliable when dealing with safety - critical edge cases. Therefore, researchers have become interested in models that combine cognitive theories, but such models are usually developed for explanatory purposes, and their effectiveness in behavior prediction has not been fully verified.
For this purpose, this paper explores the potential advantages of integrating cognitive theories into behavior prediction models, especially for the "gap acceptance" scenario in traffic. The author uses a novel cognitive model named Commotions, which combines the latest perception, decision - making, and motion control theories, and tests its performance on multiple naturalistic datasets. The results show that this model can match or even outperform existing data - driven prediction models, demonstrating the potential of applying cognitive theories in autonomous vehicles.
In summary, this paper mainly solves the following problems:
1. **Improve the safety and efficiency of autonomous vehicles**: By predicting human behavior more accurately, autonomous vehicles can improve their driving efficiency while ensuring safety.
2. **Verify the effectiveness of cognitive theories**: Evaluate the performance of cognitive theories in actual behavior prediction tasks, especially in complex traffic scenarios.
3. **Improve the limitations of existing models**: Explore how to弥补 the deficiencies of pure data - driven models in dealing with safety - critical situations by combining cognitive theories.
### Formula Representation
The formulas involved in the paper are presented in Markdown format as follows:
- **Loss function \( L_1 \)**:
\[
L_1=\sum_{i = 1}^{n_p}(|a_i - a_{\text{pred}, i, p}|+(t_i - t_{A,\text{pred}, i, p})^2)
\]
- **Loss function \( L_2 \)**:
\[
L_2 = L_1+\sum_{i = 1}^{100}\frac{V_i - 20p}{V_i + 1}
\]
where,
\[
t_i=\min\{t_{A, i},\max\{t_{C, i},t_{A,\text{pred}, i, p}\}\}
\]
\[
V_i=\min\left\{V_p(t_{A,\text{pred}, i, p}),\frac{1}{100}\right\}
\]
These formulas are used to evaluate and optimize the parameters of the Commotions model to improve its prediction performance.