Abstract:Understanding driver behavior of conditionally automated driving is necessary to ensure a safe transition from automated to manual driving. This study aimed to examine the difference in take-over performance between high crash risk (HCR) and lower crash risk (LCR) drivers in emergency take-over situations during conditionally automated driving. In the current simulator study, a 3 x 3 (within-subjects) factorial design was used, including the task factors (no task, reading the news, and watching a video) and time budget factors (time budget = 3 s, 4 s, and 5 s). Forty-eight participants completed a WA drive on an approximately 10 km long two-way six-lane urban road. The participants firstly were in manual control and then switched to the automated driving mode at a speed of 50 km/h. The automated driving system was able to detect a broken car in the ego-lane and requested the driver to take over the control of the vehicle. There are at least one or two other vehicles or motorcycles on each side of the ego-vehicle, resulting in fewer escape paths. For the two non-handheld non-driving-related tasks (NDRTs), the participants were asked to be fully engaged in a task without any need to monitor the road environments. Each participant completed nine emergency take-over situations. The participants were classified into two groups that were labeled LCR (N <= 2) and HCR drivers (N >= 3) according to the number of accidents per driver. The results show that LCR drivers had shorter brake reaction time compared to HCR drivers. For all drivers, the engagement in a task led to longer response times, and the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control. In addition, the task affected the response times for LCR and HCR drivers, but only the time budget affected the longitudinal vehicle control for LCR drivers. For all drivers, LCR and HCR drivers, the time budget and task affected the safety of take-over. Especially, the two non-handheld everyday tasks seem to have a similar effect on the drivers' workload. Therefore, the HCR drivers had a lower hazard perception compared to the LCR drivers, and the factor regarding the individual difference of driving ability in take-over situations should be considered to design safe take-over concepts for automated vehicles.

A Computational Cognitive Model of Driver Response Time for Scheduled Freeway Exiting Takeovers in Conditionally Automated Vehicles

Toward Computational Simulations of Behavior During Automated Driving Takeovers: A Review of the Empirical and Modeling Literatures

In the driver's mind: modeling the dynamics of human overtaking decisions in interactions with oncoming automated vehicles

Modelling attention allocation and takeover performance in two-stage takeover system via a cognitive computational model: considering the role of multiple monitoring requests

Effects of Driver Response Time under Take-Over Control Based on CAR-ToC Model in Human–Machine Mixed Traffic Flow

The Effects of Lead Time of Take-Over Request and Nondriving Tasks on Taking-Over Control of Automated Vehicles

A quantitative model of takeover request time budget for conditionally automated driving

Modeling take-over performance in level 3 conditionally automated vehicles

Examining the Effects of Visibility and Time Headway on the Takeover Risk during Conditionally Automated Driving

Effect of Driving Experience on Collision Avoidance Braking: an Experimental Investigation and Computational Modelling

Predicting the duration of reduced driver performance during the automated driving takeover process

Assessing the Effects of Modalities of Takeover Request, Lead Time of Takeover Request, and Traffic Conditions on Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

Modeling Driver Takeover Intention in Automated Vehicles With Attention-Based CNN Algorithm

Behavioral and physiological responses to takeovers in different scenarios during conditionally automated driving

Impact Analysis of Driver Takeover Under a Connected Environment: A Study of the External Effects on Vehicle Conversions

Exploring Driver Physiological Response During Level 3 Conditional Driving Automation

A Take-Over Performance Evaluation Model for Automated Vehicles from Automated to Manual Driving

How Does Approaching a Lead Vehicle and Monitoring Request Affect Drivers’ Takeover Performance? A Simulated Driving Study with Functional MRI

Influence of Traffic Flow Around the Intelligent Vehicle on Takeover Time in a Bottleneck of the Expressway

Evaluating Effects of Cognitive Load, Takeover Request Lead Time, and Traffic Density on Drivers’ Takeover Performance in Conditionally Automated Driving

Understanding Take-over Performance of High Crash Risk Drivers During Conditionally Automated Driving