Abstract:Some studies provide evidence that humans could actively exploit the alleged technological advantages of autonomous vehicles (AVs). This implies that humans may tend to interact differently with AVs as compared to human driven vehicles (HVs) with the knowledge that AVs are programmed to be risk-averse. Hence, it is important to investigate how humans interact with AVs in complex traffic situations. Here, we investigated whether participants would value interactions with AVs differently compared to HVs, and if these differences can be characterized on the behavioral and brain-level. We presented participants with a cover story while recording whole-head brain activity using fNIRS that they were driving under time pressure through urban traffic in the presence of other HVs and AVs. Moreover, the AVs were programmed defensively to avoid collisions and had faster braking reaction times than HVs. Participants would receive a monetary reward if they managed to finish the driving block within a given time-limit without risky driving maneuvers. During the drive, participants were repeatedly confronted with left-lane turning situations at unsignalized intersections. They had to stop and find a gap to turn in front of an oncoming stream of vehicles consisting of HVs and AVs. While the behavioral results did not show any significant difference between the safety margin used during the turning maneuvers with respect to AVs or HVs, participants tended to be more certain in their decision-making process while turning in front of AVs as reflected by the smaller variance in the gap size acceptance as compared to HVs. Importantly, using a multivariate logistic regression approach, we were able to predict whether the participants decided to turn in front of HVs or AVs from whole-head fNIRS in the decision-making phase for every participant (mean accuracy = 67.2%, SD = 5%). Channel-wise univariate fNIRS analysis revealed increased brain activation differences for turning in front of AVs compared to HVs in brain areas that represent the valuation of actions taken during decision-making. The insights provided here may be useful for the development of control systems to assess interactions in future mixed traffic environments involving AVs and HVs.

Risk-Taking Driving Behavior in Interacting With an Autonomous Vehicle at Two-Way Stop-Controlled Intersections

This is not me! Technology-identity concerns in consumers' acceptance of autonomous vehicle technology

Driving Aggressively or Conservatively? Investigating the Effects of Automated Vehicle Interaction Type and Road Event on Drivers' Trust and Preferred Driving Style

Exploring the associations between driving volatility and autonomous vehicle hazardous scenarios: Insights from field operational test data

Characterizing Behavioral Differences and Adaptations of Automated Vehicles and Human Drivers at Unsignalized Intersections: Insights from Waymo and Lyft Open Datasets

Exploring User Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: Impact of Driver and Vehicle Styles

Understanding Human-machine Cooperation in Game-theoretical Driving Scenarios Amid Mixed Traffic

Investigating Differences in Behavior and Brain in Human-Human and Human-Autonomous Vehicle Interactions in Time-Critical Situations

Greater prosociality toward other human drivers than autonomous vehicles: Human drivers' discriminatory behavior in mixed traffic

Characterizing Behavioral Differences of Autonomous Vehicles and Human-Driven Vehicles at Signalized Intersections Based on Waymo Open Dataset

sCARy! Risk Perceptions in Autonomous Driving: The Influence of Experience on Perceived Benefits and Barriers

Machines meet humans on the social road: Risk implications

Experience of drivers of all age groups in accepting autonomous vehicle technology

What Influences Vulnerable Road Users’ Perceptions of Autonomous Vehicles? A Comparative Analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh Surveys

Intention of Risk-Taking Behavior at Unsignalized Intersections Under the Connected Vehicle Environment

The risk ethics of autonomous vehicles: an empirical approach

An Empirical Investigation on the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: Perspective of Drivers' Self–AV Bias

Ready to Bully Automated Vehicles on Public Roads?

Is it OK to bully automated cars?

Deviant Behavior of Pedestrians: A Risk Gamble or Just Against Automated Vehicles? How About Social Control?

Exploring HDV Driver–CAV Interaction in Mixed Traffic: A Two-Step Method Integrating Latent Profile Analysis and Multinomial Logit Model