Abstract:This paper explains the existence of a financial intermediary based on its advantages over firms in designing low market risk debt securities and high market risk equity securities when markets are incomplete. The firm's objective in the model is to choose a financial structure in order to maximize the value of its securities. When markets are complete, the value of a firm's securities is independent of how they are structured or sold. When markets are incomplete and investors have heterogenous risk preferences, as assumed in this model, it is possible to increase the total value of securities by choosing the optimal mix of debt and equity, as shown by Allen and Gale (1988). In this paper the option for firms to set up a financial intermediary is introduced. It is then shown that it is possible to further increase the value of securities by delegating security design to a financial intermediary. This means that firms sell their securities to a financial intermediary who then builds a pool of securities and chooses the optimal structure of debt and equity for refinancing. It is assumed that investors are either risk-averse or risk neutral; firms' returns are imperfectly correlated; investors can fully diversify at no costs; firms and investors have the same information and expectations about the future; markets are incomplete in two regards: 1) state-contingent securities that purely reflect market risk or diversifiable risk do not exist, 2) investors cannot issue securities. The main result of this paper is that a financial intermediary may arise endogenously as constituent of the optimal financial structure a firm can choose when markets are incomplete. A financial intermediary can create a large pool of assets and, based on the law of large numbers, design equity securities that reflect purely market risk and design debt securities that reflect purely diversifiable risk. In other words, a financial intermediary can make market risk and diversifiable risk separately contractible. A single firm can not do this and will therefore delegate security design to a financial intermediary if this implies an increase in value of its securities that is above its delegation costs. The optimal financial structure in this model depends on risk-characteristics of firms, risk preferences of investors and firms' costs for delegating security design. This paper adds to theories on financial intermediation that are based on transaction costs and asymmetric information.

A Theory of Intermediated Investment with Hyperbolic Discounting Investors.

Intensified distortion: Investment decisions with endogenous contracts and time inconsistency

Irreversible investment under weighted discounting: effects of decreasing impatience

Financial Intermediation and Delegated Security Design

Financial Intermediation Chains in an Over-the-Counter Market

Equilibrium Debt Financing

Impediments to Financial Trade: Theory and Applications

Optimal Investment Problem under Behavioral Setting: A Lagrange Duality Perspective

Despite Absolute Information Advantages, All Investors Incur Welfare Loss

Optimal Contracts for Time-Inconsistent Consumers with Heterogeneous Beliefs

An Experimental Research of Financial Contracts'Effect on Bilateral Moral Hazard and Social Welfare

Intermediation, Capital Immobility, and Asset Prices

The Role of Information Disclosure in Financial Intermediation with Investment Risk

Dynamic Investment-Driven Insurance Pricing: Equilibrium Analysis and Welfare Implication

Optimal Contracting with Unobservable Managerial Hedging

Intermediation Via Credit Chains

Intermediation Capital and Asset Prices

Dynamic Contract Design in the Presence Of Double Moral Hazard

Managerial compensation with hyperbolic discounting

Optimal Long-Term Contracting with Learning

Contract Design and Self-Control with Asymmetric Information