Abstract:Emerging smart technology spawns many start-up firms, which enter into the market and bring more instability and uncertainty to supply chains. This paper develops a game-theoretic model which captures the most crucial factors in market entry stage, such as market uncertainty, competition, contract design, distribution channel, and sustainability. We consider a supply chain consisting of one supplier and two retailers (an incumbent and an entrant). We assume that the incumbent first enters a market and possesses private information about market demand. The entrant encroaches upon the market after observing its big growth potentials. In this paper, we study how the supplier optimally designs the contract for the retailers under asymmetric information to make the supply chain more efficient and sustainable. Subsequently, we investigate the preference of contractual forms between a franchise contract (FC) and a two-part tariff contract (TTC), from the perspectives of the supplier, the incumbent retailer, and the whole supply chain, respectively. It turns out that the supplier prefers the TTC while the incumbent is better off under the FC when the demand variation is relatively high. In addition, we find that the TTC is beneficial to the whole supply chain in most cases. In other words, TTC can promote the coordination of the supply chain and realize the sustainable development of the supply chain. We further analyze the impact of the entrant entry on the supplier’s contract design for the incumbent. The supplier tends to charge the lower wholesale price and less franchise fee for the incumbent after the entrant entry. The supplier’s contract strategy is conducive to maintaining the horizontal competition and promoting the sustainability of the supply chain. We also analyze the supplier’s distribution channel decision and find that she is more willing to block the entrant from entering the market in most cases because the incumbent with the private demand information makes the supply chain more efficient. Finally, we also extend our results by altering some assumption in the basic model.

Contract Design and Self-Control with Asymmetric Information

Optimal Contracts for Time-Inconsistent Consumers with Heterogeneous Beliefs

Supply Chain Coordination under Asymmetric Risk Aversion Information

Contracting with asymmetric cost information in a dual-channel supply chain.

Designing Supply Contracts: Contract Type and Information Asymmetry

Dynamic Contract Design in the Presence Of Double Moral Hazard

Supply Chain Contracting with Asymmetric Cost Information and Behavioral Preferences: Theory and Experiment

Optimal policy choice and asymmetric information in a mixed market

Efficient Economic Contest under Dual Information Asymmetry

Optimal Long-Term Contracting with Learning

Supplier-retailer contracting under asymmetric risk attitude information in supply chain

Design of Supply Chain Linear Shared-Saving Contract with Asymmetric Information

Optimal dynamic insurance contracts

Contracting and Coordination under Asymmetric Production Cost Information

Sunk Cost Effect, Self-Control, and Contract Design

Learning by Consuming: Optimal Pricing with Endogenous Information Provision

Study on the Contract Design under the Obligation of Information Cost and Demand Information Sharing Incentive

Optimal contracts under competition when uncertainty from adverse selection and moral hazard are present

Contract design under asymmetric demand information for sustainable supply chain practices

Technology licensing contract design considering royalty transparency and demand information asymmetry with downstream co-opetition

Cooperative advertising contract design in a supply chain with an offline showroom under asymmetric information