Quantifying exposure biases in early instrumental land surface air temperature observations

Emily J. Wallis,Timothy J. Osborn,Michael Taylor,Philip D. Jones,Manoj Joshi,Ed Hawkins

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.8401

2024-03-15

International Journal of Climatology

Abstract:The transition from non‐standard thermometer exposures to Stevenson‐type screens introduced exposure biases into land air temperature records. This study uses parallel measurements to (a) characterize the exposure bias in four main classes of exposure and (b) develop exposure‐specific models to estimate the bias at individual weather stations. Application of the models to mid‐latitude stations in CRUTEM5 suggests the biases present in the mid‐latitude annual means are relatively small (≤±0.1°C) but can be larger in individual grid cells (up to −0.57°C). Exposure biases are a pervasive non‐climatic change in land air temperature records which have been introduced as a result of changes in the way thermometers were sheltered from solar radiation and the elements over time. Exposure biases have not been widely accounted for in observational records, due to difficulties detecting/correcting the bias using traditional homogenisation techniques; therefore, exposure biases still contribute significant uncertainty to the early period in global temperature compilations. Here, an empirical approach to address the bias arising from the introduction of Stevenson‐type screens from the late‐19th century is presented. The approach consists of: (1) an empirical analysis of 54 parallel measurement series to identify the characteristics of the exposure bias in four exposure classes; (2) the development of bias‐estimation models based on an analysis of which variables influence the bias; and (3) the application of the models to an extended version of CRUTEM5 (CRUTEM5_ext), based on exposure metadata, to quantify and reduce the bias. Step one identified differences between the temperatures recorded in Stevenson screens and early exposures, which vary seasonally, diurnally, and with location and exposure class. The largest biases (in mean temperatures) were found in freestanding exposures (up to −0.78°C annually) and in summer, while the smallest biases were generally found in wall‐mounted exposures (near‐0°C annually) and in winter. Significant relationships between the bias and temperature, downward top of atmosphere and/or received shortwave downward solar radiation were found in each exposure class and led to the development of three regression‐based bias‐estimation models. Application of these models to 1,960 mid‐latitude stations in CRUTEM5_ext, resulted in small (≤0.016°C) positive adjustments to the Northern Hemisphere mid‐latitude mean before 1880, and larger (≤−0.1°C) negative adjustments to the Northern and Southern Hemisphere mid‐latitude means between 1882–1934 and 1856–1900, respectively. Larger adjustments were estimated regionally: up to −0.57°C annually and −0.79°C seasonally in individual grid cells.

meteorology & atmospheric sciences