Impact of Geolocations of Validation Data on the Evaluation of Surface Incident Shortwave Radiation from Earth System Models

Qian Ma,Kaicun Wang,Martin Wild
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014jd022572
2015-01-01
Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
Abstract:Ground-based observations of surface incident solar radiation (R-s) have been used to evaluate simulations of global climate models. Existing studies have shown that biases in simulated clouds have a significant spatial pattern, which may be transferred to the simulated R-s. Therefore, the evaluation results of R-s simulations may depend on the locations of the ground-based observations. In this study, R-s simulations of 48 models participating in the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5) were first evaluated with ground-based observations from different networks (446 stations in total) from 2000 to 2005. The global mean biases of the CMIP5 R-s simulations were found to vary from 4.8 to 11.9Wm(-2) when R-s observations from different networks were used as reference data. To reduce the location impact on the evaluation results, CMIP5 simulated R-s was then evaluated with the latest satellite R-s retrieval at 1 degrees x1 degrees spatial resolution by the Clouds and the Earth's Radiant Energy System, Energy Balanced and Filled (CERES EBAF). It was found that the CMIP5 simulated multimodel mean R-s has a small bias of 2.6Wm(-2) compared with CERES EBAF over the globe, 4.7Wm(-2) and 1.7Wm(-2) over land and oceans, respectively. CERES EBAF R-s was found to have a positive bias of 1.3Wm(-2) compared with ground-based observations. After removing this bias of CERES EBAF R-s, global mean R-s was estimated to be 185Wm(-2).
What problem does this paper attempt to address?