The Effect of Timing of Debridement and Surgical Intervention in Open Fractures on the Rate of Infection and Surgical Outcomes: A Prospective Study in a Tertiary Care Setup
Arpit Singh,Ankur Agarwal,Ravindra Mohan,Shailendra Singh,Prakash Tewari,Shubham Srivastava
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.37204
2023-04-06
Cureus
Abstract:Introduction Open fractures remain one of the true orthopedic emergencies. Despite recent advances in orthopedic surgery, the management of compound fractures is still a challenge to an orthopedic surgeon. Open fractures are a result of high-speed injuries and are associated with several complications such as infections, non-unions, or sometimes an eventual amputation. Infection is the major problem associated with open fractures due to soft tissue damage, contamination, and neurovascular compromise. Presently, management of open fractures requires early aggressive debridement followed by limb salvage by definitive reconstruction or amputation, depending upon the extent and location of the injury. Early aggressive debridement of open fractures has always been the rule. However, it has been observed that open fractures managed even after six hours of injury fare well, and there are no definite guidelines available to decide the safe period of debridement following open fractures so as to prevent infection. The "six-hour rule" is a hotly debated topic with fervent perseverance of this dogma despite a gross lack of support from the literature. Objective The objective of this study was to analyze the relationship between the timing of operation/debridement on infection rates in open fractures, particularly if surgery is performed after six hours. Methods This is a prospective study of 124 patients (R=5-75 years) presenting with open fractures to the outpatient department (OPD) and emergency section of a tertiary care hospital from January 2019 to November 2020. Patients were divided into four groups based on the time to operation/debridement: groups A, B, C, and D, with patients operated within six hours, six to 12 hours, 12-24 hours, and 24-72 hours after injury, respectively. Infection rates were obtained based on the above data. ANOVA was applied using SPSS 20 software (IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). Results This study concludes that the infection rate for fractures treated in less than six hours was 18.75%; in the six to 12 hours group, it was 18.50%, and in the 12-24 hours group, it was 14.28%. The infection rate increased to 38.8% if surgery was performed after 24 hours of injury. On statistical analysis, the time to debridement was not found to be a significant factor. The infection rate in Gustilo-Anderson classification compound grade I was 2.7%, grade II 9.8%, grade IIIA 45%, and grade IIIB 61%. Also, in this study, the union rate in grade I was 97.22%, grade II 96.07%, grade IIIA 85%, and grade IIIB 66.66%. Thus, the degree of wound contamination and compounding gives a prognostic indication regarding the final outcome of the compound fracture. Conclusion Time to debridement is not a significant factor in the management of compound fractures, and these fractures can be safely debrided up to 24 hours after injury. Gustilo and Anderson's classification provides a prognostic indicator of the outcome of a compound fracture. Infection rates and non-union rates increase with increasing grades of compound fractures.