Effect of kinds of membrane materials on membrane fouling with BSA

Masatoshi Hashino,Keisuke Hirami,Toru Ishigami,Yoshikage Ohmukai,Tatsuo Maruyama,Noboru Kubota,Hideto Matsuyama
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2011.09.015
IF: 9.5
2011-11-01
Journal of Membrane Science
Abstract:Three kinds of membranes were prepared via non-solvent-induced phase separation using poly(ethylene-co-vinyl alcohol) (EVOH), polyether sulfone (PES) and poly(vinylidene fluoride) (PVDF), which are used widely membrane materials. The resulting membranes had structures with skin layers and macrovoids, and their molecular weight cut-offs (MWCOs) and pure water permeabilities were 45–130kDa and 70–100L/(m2barh), respectively. In BSA filtration experiments, the EVOH membrane showed high relative permeability after 60min of filtration, while the PVDF membrane showed severe permeability decline. The results of filtrations for BSA solution by three membranes could not be explained by the difference of pure water permeabilities and initial MWCOs. The adsorption behaviors of BSA on the polymers were examined using a quartz crystal microbalance with the dissipation monitoring (QCM-D) method. The order of BSA adsorption amounts on polymers measured by QCM-D was in agreement with the order of BSA rejection during filtration. PVDF showed the highest adsorption amount and the most rigid adsorption layer, while EVOH showed the lowest adsorption amount and the softest adsorption layer. Adhesion force measurements of PVDF–BSA and BSA–BSA were also conducted using atomic force microscopy. The PVDF–BSA interaction was much stronger than the BSA–BSA interaction, indicating that membrane fouling resulted from the physicochemical interactions between polymers and BSA rather than that between BSA and BSA on the membrane surface.
engineering, chemical,polymer science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?