Development of a novel RNA-based immune checkpoint inhibitor response signature (ICI-PRS) that avoids standard-of-care (SOC) prognostic signal for use in patients with urothelial cancer (UC).

Jonathan Shepherd,Gregory Mayhew,John Guo,Kirk Beebe,Joel Robert Eisner,Michael Vance Milburn
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.549
IF: 45.3
2024-02-01
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:549 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) shows great promise, including approval of pembrolizumab, nivolumab and avelumab in urothelial cancer (UC). However, the overall percentage of UC patients with clinical benefit is relatively small, despite biomarker use to select patients (e.g., PD-1 expression and TMB). Recently, several accelerated approvals (atezolizumab and durvalumab) were subsequently withdrawn following failure to show improved survival compared to standard of care (SOC) treatment in Phase 3 +/- biomarker use. To address the need for better ICI biomarkers, we developed an RNA-based predictive response signature (ICI-PRS) with the primary objective of being prognostic for ICI-treated patients, but not for SOC treatment. Methods: A survival-based model trained on 2/3 of the combined IMVigor210 dataset (n=298 locally advanced or metastatic UC patients treated with atezolizumab) and TCGA BLCA cohort (n=405 patients treated with non-ICI SOC) identified genes associated with survival across these data sets (prognostic agnostic to therapy) and genes distinctly associated with survival with ICI treatment (candidate ICI-predictive). Candidate ICI-predictive genes were developed into a model that was applied to the remaining IMVigor210 and TCGA BLCA samples, UC-GENOME urothelial carcinoma samples, and an ICI-treated melanoma dataset (Gide et al, 2019 : DOI: 10.1016/j.ccell.2019.01.003). Associations with tumor mutation burden (TMB) were examined. Expanded models incorporating this signature with additional immune markers were also investigated. Results: The ICI-PRS shows consistent associations with overall survival (OS) dependent on ICI treatment status. A higher hazard ratio (HR) was found for cohorts with ICI-therapy [HR (95% CI): IMVigor test 1.23 (0.96-1.57); UCGENOME 1.35 (0.99-1.85); Gide 1.50 (1.02-2.2)]. By comparison, no association was seen in the TCGA test set in which patients received non-ICI SOC treatment (HR = 0.96 (0.73-1.3). Patients with high TMB had extended survival in both IMVigor210 and non-ICI SOC TCGA datasets (P = 0.02 and 0.001). Conclusions: Herein we describe the development of a novel ICI-PRS and initial demonstration that it provides ICI-treatment specific prognostic value for bladder cancer patients. ICI-PRS status was associated with extended survival in patients treated with anti-PD-L1 but not non-ICI SOC therapy. These results support the further evaluation of the ICI-PRS and potential development as a diagnostic test for selecting UC patients most likely to benefit from ICI therapy.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?