The potential of transcriptomic profiling to predict immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICIs) response in locally advanced (La) and metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC).

Belen Caramelo,Nerea Muñoz Unceta,Javier Freire,Ignacio Varela,David Martin,Sofía Del Carmen,Ainara Azueta,Pilar Diaz,Pilar Garcia-Berbel,Naiara Sagastibelza Marinelarena,Macarena Rey-Cárdenas,Daniel Castellano,Miguel Ángel Climent,Javier Puente,Juan Irure,Laura Revuelta,Fernanda Genre,Diego Cacho,Javier Gómez,Ignacio Duran
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.668
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:668 Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have proven to be an effective therapy for locally advanced (La) and metastatic (mUC) urothelial carcinoma. However, response rates are typically modest, and patient (pt) selection remains a challenge, especially in the era of ICIs-based combos. The current study analyzes the differential RNA expression as a predictor of ICI response or resistance in La/mUC. Methods: Clinical information and formalin-fixed paraffin embedded (FFPE) samples from pts with La/mUC treated with single agent ICIs [2014 -2021] were obtained and RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) analysis performed. According to response, pts were assigned to one of these three groups: Primary resistant [PR] (progressive disease (PD) as the best response); Secondary resistant [SR] (initial response followed by PD); and Long responders [LR] (stable disease/partial or complete response maintained > 16 months). Results: Clinical data and FFPE samples from 46 patients were available. Nineteen, twelve and fifteen pts respectively were in the PR, SR and LR groups. Clinical characteristics were well-balanced among groups, except for higher percentage of liver metastasis in PR and SR pts. The median overall survival was 11.2 and 18.2 months for the PR and the SR groups and has not yet been reached for the LR cohort, where 80% of the pts remain alive, with 50% achieving complete response. RNA-seq analysis unveiled distinct patterns of differential gene expression in the resistance groups compared to the LR. Notably, an upregulation of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition pathway was observed, with interleukin 2 emerging as a potential surrogate marker of this activity. Additionally, an overactivation of the KRAS pathway was evident, irrespective of its mutational status. Furthermore, in a comparison between the two resistance groups, the SR group displayed increased activation of DNA damage control mechanisms. Conclusions: Our RNA-seq analysis could provide relevant information and holds promise as a valuable tool for predicting responses to ICIs in La-mUC. Nonetheless, further validation on a larger cohort of patients is required.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?