Genomic correlates of response and resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) in a real-world setting.

Nikhil Pramod,Vladimir Makarov,Scott Dawsey,Paul G. Pavicic,Ubenthira Patgunarajah,Monica Nair,Moshe Chaim Ornstein,Timothy D. Gilligan,Christopher Eing Wee,Amanda Nizam,Omar Y. Mian,Jane Nguyen,C. Marcela Diaz-Montero,Shilpa Gupta
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.4_suppl.670
IF: 45.3
2024-01-31
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Abstract:670 Background: Response rates with ICI are only about 20% in mUC and we lack validated biomarkers to select patients who are most likely to derive benefit from ICI. Programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) has not proven to be a useful biomarker. We need biomarkers of response and resistance to avoid nonbeneficial treatment (Tx) and spare the majority of pts who will not respond to ICI both physical and financial toxicity. Here we report tumor genomic correlates of response and resistance to ICI in pts with mUC. Methods: We identified 335 adult pts with mUC at the Cleveland Clinic treated who received > / = 2 cycles of ICI with pembrolizumab (P) or atezolizumab (A) between 2015 and 2023. Of the 335 pts, 49 had pre-Tx archival formalin fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissues available. Pts were categorized by their response to ICI as responders (R) (Complete Response (CR), Partial Response (PR), and Stable Disease (SD)) (N = 23) or non-responders (NR) (Progressive Disease (PD)) (N = 26). Whole exome sequencing was performed from macro dissected tumors. Raw data in FASTQ format was aligned to GRCh38 human reference genome, somatic mutations were called by Mutect2 (part of GATK4) and allele-specific copy-number analysis was performed by applying the Facets and Gistic2 package. Results: Comparison of our cohort Tumor Mutation Burden (TMB) with mutation burden of 33 the cancer genome atlas (TCGA) cohorts shows close similarity to TCGA bladder urothelial carcinoma (BCLA). Median TMB in our cohort was 6.46 muts/Mb. In our cohort, TP53 hotspot mutations were found in 52% of the (R) cohort compared to 31% in the (NR) cohort. Additionally, mutations in KMT2C and KMT2A were found in 26% and 22% of the (R) cohort compared to 8% and 12 % of the (NR) cohort. (R) also had increased mutations in the ARID1A (17% vs 4%) and ERBB2 (17% vs 4%) compared to (NR). FGFR3 missense mutations were seen in only 4% of (R) cohort compared to 15% in (NR). In our complete cohort, 49% of patients had ERBB2 copy number amplifications and 92% of patient had CREBP2 deletions. Conclusions: In our real-world cohort of mUC pts treated with ICI, we identified differential genomic alterations between (R) and (NR). High frequency of ERBB2 mutations and alterations in overall cohort and higher frequency in (R) suggests potential role for anti-HER2 therapies alone or in combination with ICI. Ongoing genomic and immunologic correlative studies in our cohort will further help understand biomarkers of response and resistance to ICI in pts with mUC.
oncology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?