Abstract:To facilitate developers in effective allocation of their testing and debugging efforts, many software defect prediction techniques have been proposed in the literature. These techniques can be used to predict classes that are more likely to be buggy based on the past history of classes, methods, or certain other code elements. These techniques are effective provided that a sufficient amount of data is available to train a prediction model. However, sufficient training data are rarely available for new software projects. To resolve this problem, cross-project defect prediction, which transfers a prediction model trained using data from one project to another, was proposed and is regarded as a new challenge in the area of defect prediction. Thus far, only a few cross-project defect prediction techniques have been proposed. To advance the state of the art, in this study, we investigated seven composite algorithms that integrate multiple machine learning classifiers to improve cross-project defect prediction. To evaluate the performance of the composite algorithms, we performed experiments on 10 open-source software systems from the PROMISE repository, which contain a total of 5,305 instances labeled as defective or clean. We compared the composite algorithms with the combined defect predictor where logistic regression is used as the meta classification algorithm (CODEP (Logistic) ), which is the most recent cross-project defect prediction algorithm in terms of two standard evaluation metrics: cost effectiveness and F-measure. Our experimental results show that several algorithms outperform CODEP (Logistic) : Maximum voting shows the best performance in terms of F-measure and its average F-measure is superior to that of CODEP (Logistic) by 36.88%. Bootstrap aggregation (Bagging (J48)) shows the best performance in terms of cost effectiveness and its average cost effectiveness is superior to that of CODEP (Logistic) by 15.34%.

Could We Predict the Result of a Continuous Integration Build? An Empirical Study

An Empirical Study on the Cross-Project Predictability of Continuous Integration Outcomes.

Predictive Models in Software Engineering: Challenges and Opportunities

What Are the Factors Impacting Build Breakage?

Does Socio-Technical Congruence Have an Effect on Continuous Integration Build Failures? An Empirical Study on 10 GitHub Projects

Cutting the Software Building Efforts in Continuous Integration by Semi-Supervised Online AUC Optimization.

Predicting Crashing Releases of Mobile Applications

Built to Last or Built Too Fast? Evaluating Prediction Models for Build Times

The Why, When, What, and How about Predictive Continuous Integration: A Simulation-Based Investigation

A Large Scale Study of Long-Time Contributor Prediction for GitHub Projects

Long-Term Active Integrator Prediction in the Evaluation of Code Contributions.

An Experimental Evaluation of Imbalanced Learning and Time-Series Validation in the Context of CI/CD Prediction

BuildFast

Continuous Defect Prediction: The Idea and a Related Dataset

Practitioners' Challenges and Perceptions of CI Build Failure Predictions at Atlassian

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

On combining commit grouping and build skip prediction to reduce redundant continuous integration activity

A large-scale empirical study of compiler errors in continuous integration.

Detecting Continuous Integration Skip : A Reinforcement Learning-based Approach

BuildSheriff

Commit Artifact Preserving Build Prediction