Abstract:Most software defect prediction approaches are trained and applied on data from the same project. However, often a new project does not have enough training data. Cross-project defect prediction, which uses data from other projects to predict defects in a particular project, provides a new perspective to defect prediction. In this work, we propose a HYbrid moDel Reconstruction Approach (HYDRA) for cross-project defect prediction, which includes two phases: genetic algorithm (GA) phase and ensemble learning (EL) phase. These two phases create a massive composition of classifiers. To examine the benefits of HYDRA, we perform experiments on 29 datasets from the PROMISE repository which contains a total of 11,196 instances (i.e., Java classes) labeled as defective or clean. We experiment with logistic regression as the underlying classification algorithm of HYDRA. We compare our approach with the most recently proposed cross-project defect prediction approaches: TCA+ by Nam et al., Peters filter by Peters et al., GP by Liu et al., MO by Canfora et al., and CODEP by Panichella et al. Our results show that HYDRA achieves an average F1-score of 0.544. On average, across the 29 datasets, these results correspond to an improvement in the F1-scores of 26.22, 34.99, 47.43, 28.61, and 30.14 percent over TCA+, Peters filter, GP, MO, and CODEP, respectively. In addition, HYDRA on average can discover 33 percent of all bugs if developers inspect the top 20 percent lines of code, which improves the best baseline approach (TCA+) by 44.41 percent. We also find that HYDRA improves the F1-score of Zero-R which predict all the instances to be defective by 5.42 percent, but improves Zero-R by 58.65 percent when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code. In practice, Zero-R can be hard to use since it simply predicts all of the instances to be defective, and thus developers have to inspect all of the instances to find the defective ones. Moreover, we notice the improvement of HYDRA over other baseline approaches in terms of F1-score and when inspecting the top 20 percent lines of code are substantial, and in most cases the improvements are significant and have large effect sizes across the 29 datasets.

An Empirical Study on the Cross-Project Predictability of Continuous Integration Outcomes.

Could We Predict the Result of a Continuous Integration Build? An Empirical Study

Combined Classifier for Cross-Project Defect Prediction: an Extended Empirical Study.

HYDRA: Massively Compositional Model for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

An investigation on the effect of cross project data for prediction accuracy

Cross-Project Change-Proneness Prediction

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Considering Multiple Data Distribution Simultaneously

DSSDPP: Data Selection and Sampling Based Domain Programming Predictor for Cross-Project Defect Prediction

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Based on SMOTE and Deep Canonical Correlation Analysis

Online cross-project approach with project-level similarity for just-in-time software defect prediction

An Investigation of Cross-Project Learning in Online Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction

Cross-Project Defect Prediction Based on Two-Phase Feature Importance Amplification

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Using Feature-Based Transfer Learning

Cross-Project Online Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction

Empirical validation of machine learning techniques for heterogeneous cross-project change prediction and within-project change prediction

Cross-Project Issue Classification Based On Ensemble Modeling In A Social Coding World

Improve Cross-Project Just-in-time Defect Prediction with Dynamic Transfer Learning

Identifying Crashing Fault Residence Based on Cross Project Model

Exploiting Correlation Subspace to Predict Heterogeneous Cross-Project Defects

Cross-Project Software Defect Prediction Based on Feature Selection and Transfer Learning

A Cross-Project Defect Prediction Model Based on Deep Learning With Self-Attention