Abstract:This paper provides an in-depth study and analysis of software defect prediction methods in a cloud environment and uses a deep learning approach to justify software prediction. A cost penalty term is added to the supervised part of the deep ladder network; that is, the misclassification cost of different classes is added to the model. A cost-sensitive deep ladder network-based software defect prediction model is proposed, which effectively mitigates the negative impact of the class imbalance problem on defect prediction. To address the problem of lack or insufficiency of historical data from the same project, a flow learning-based geodesic cross-project software defect prediction method is proposed. Drawing on data information from other projects, a migration learning approach was used to embed the source and target datasets into a Gaussian manifold. The kernel encapsulates the incremental changes between the differences and commonalities between the two domains. To this point, the subspace is the space of two distributional approximations formed by the source and target data transformations, with traditional in-project software defect classifiers used to predict labels. It is found that real-time defect prediction is more practical because it has a smaller amount of code to review; only individual changes need to be reviewed rather than entire files or packages while making it easier for developers to assign fixes to defects. More importantly, this paper combines deep belief network techniques with real-time defect prediction at a fine-grained level and TCA techniques to deal with data imbalance and proposes an improved deep belief network approach for real-time defect prediction, while trying to change the machine learning classifier underlying DBN for different experimental studies, and the results not only validate the effectiveness of using TCA techniques to solve the data imbalance problem but also show that the defect prediction model learned by the improved method in this paper has better prediction performance.

Continuous Defect Prediction: The Idea and a Related Dataset

Unifying Defect Prediction, Categorization, and Repair by Multi-Task Deep Learning

Deep Learning for Just-In-Time Defect Prediction

Deep Learning Based Continuous Integration and Continuous Delivery Software Defect Prediction with Effective Optimization Strategy

The Need for a Fine-grained approach in Just-in-Time Defect Prediction

Defectors: A Large, Diverse Python Dataset for Defect Prediction

Could We Predict the Result of a Continuous Integration Build? An Empirical Study

Feature Sets in Just-in-Time Defect Prediction: An Empirical Evaluation

Real-Time Forecasting of Subsurface Inclusion Defects for Continuous Casting Slabs: A Data-Driven Comparative Study

A Systematic Survey of Just-in-Time Software Defect Prediction

Does Socio-Technical Congruence Have an Effect on Continuous Integration Build Failures? An Empirical Study on 10 GitHub Projects

A Procedure to Continuously Evaluate Predictive Performance of Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction Models During Software Development

Line-Level Defect Prediction by Capturing Code Contexts with Graph Convolutional Networks

BugSwarm: Mining and Continuously Growing a Dataset of Reproducible Failures and Fixes

CDS: A Cross–Version Software Defect Prediction Model with Data Selection

Deep Learning Software Defect Prediction Methods for Cloud Environments Research

Towards Reliable Online Just-in-Time Software Defect Prediction

Within-Project Defect Prediction

The Why, When, What, and How about Predictive Continuous Integration: A Simulation-Based Investigation

Deep Incremental Learning of Imbalanced Data for Just-In-Time Software Defect Prediction

Cross Version Defect Prediction with Representative Data Via Sparse Subset Selection