Application of Electrophysiological Methods and Magnetic Resonance Tomographic Angiography in the Differentiation Between Hemifacial Spasm and Meige Syndrome

Chuyi Huang,Suhua Miao,Heling Chu,Aikeremujiang Muheremu,Jinting Wu,Rongsong Zhou,Huancong Zuo,Yu Ma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10072-016-2492-2
2016-01-01
Neurological Sciences
Abstract:Bilateral hemifacial spasm and Meige syndrome can be easily confused due to their similar clinical manifestation. Here, we aimed to investigate the application of electrophysiological methods and magnetic resonance tomographic angiography (MRTA) in the differentiation between hemifacial spasm and Meige syndrome. 10 patients with bilateral hemifacial spasm and 9 patients with Meige syndrome received electrophysiological monitoring of nerves. There were two males and eight females with bilateral hemifacial spasm, aged 16–58 years with a course of 5–54 months. For the patients with Meige syndrome, there were three males and six females, aged 51–68 years with a course of 12–36 months. All patients received conventional MRTA of the brain blood vessels before decompression. We found that all patients with Meige syndrome showed synchronous contraction of bilateral orbicularis oculi muscles and (or) burst discharge from orbicularis oris muscles in surface electromyography (sEMG). However, those with hemifacial spasm presented with bilaterally asynchronous burst discharge. Electromyography for patients with Meige syndrome did not record abnormal muscle response (AMR), but recorded AMR for those with bilateral hemifacial spasm. The offending vessels were compressed in patients with hemifacial spasm in MRTA, while MRTA results were generally negative for those with Meige syndrome. Combining sEMG and AMR detection in EMG and MRTA, bilateral hemifacial spasm can be differentiated from Meige syndrome with a reduction of misdiagnosis rate.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?