Using strength-duration analysis to identify the afferent limb of the lateral spread response in hemifacial spasm patients during microvascular decompression surgery

Marshall F Wilkinson,Tumul Chowdhury,Anthony M Kaufmann
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2020.01.075
Abstract:Strength-duration analysis has been used to identify excitability differences between motor and sensory axons in human peripheral mixed nerves. The trigeminal and facial nerves have both been suggested to play a role in mediating the lateral spread response (LSR) in patients with hemifacial spasm (HFS). We sought to investigate this hypothesis by analyzing strength-duration properties of spasm side mentalis M wave and o. oculi LSR in 22 patients undergoing microvascular decompression surgery for HFS. Simultaneous recordings of mentalis M wave and o. oculi LSR prior to dural opening were collected following marginal mandibular facial nerve branch stimulation. Threshold responses were observed at stimulus pulse widths from 0.05 to 1.0 ms and the chronaxie and rheobase calculated from charge versus stimulus pulse width plots. The mean chronaxie (±SEM) of mentalis M wave was 0.34 ± 0.03 ms and 0.33 ± 0.04 ms for the LSR (p = 0.42, one-tailed t-test). The rheobase for the M wave (8.0 ± 1.0 mA) was found to be significantly different than the LSR rheobase (5.7 ± 0.7 mA; p = 0.03, one-tailed t-test) likely due to differences in the threshold amplitudes of the M wave versus the LSR. These results are highly suggestive of the facial nerve and not the trigeminal nerve in mediating the LSR.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?