Abstract:The eddy covariance (EC) technique measuring the turbulent exchanges of heat, moisture, CO2 and momentum between surface and atmosphere has been used widely. However, the use of EC is based on some assumptions which do not exist in practice. So the results are not accurate without necessary corrections. Using data collected at the Semi-Arid Climate and Environment Observatory of Lanzhou University (SACOL), this work studies a method of acquiring high quality surface turbulent flux. In this approach, eddy covariance data processing includes eliminating despikes, coordinate rotations, sonic temperature correction, and WPL correction (correction for density fluctuations). Double rotation and planar fit are used to do coordinate rotations. The fluctuations of sonic temperature include the effect of humidity on the speed of sound, and should be converted into actual temperature. WPL correction was required to latent heat flux and CO2 flux for the density effects due to heat and water vapor transfer on turbulent flux measurements. Quality control is performed by the stationarity test, integral turbulent characteristics (ITC) test and overall quality is controlled to permit selecting high quality data. The results show that sonic temperature correction decreases sensible heat flux by about 7. 3% when using DR, but 5. 9% when using PF. The stability can influence the results of sonic temperature correction. WPL increases latent heat flux by 7. 4% and decreases CO2 flux by 72. 2%, respectively. Three coordinate rotations have great influence on momentum but little on scalar fluxes. The values of u(*) obtained from DR and PF are decreased by 6% and 3%, respectively. Only considering the dominant wind direction, the wind direction has no relationship with the correction of u(*) by DR which reduces u(*) by 5%. As the turbulent exchange strengthened (u(*) u003e 0. 3 m.s(-1)), PF and FPF gradually exhibit that the corrected values in southeast are bigger than the northwest area, PF in the southeast wind area increases u(*) by 9. 23%, yet decreases 3. 86% in the northwest area and FPF in southeast wind area increases u(*) by 10. 09%, yet decreases 1. 18% in the northwest area. The differences of the steady state tests between DR and PF are mainly in A parameterization scheme of DR and PF for SACOL provided in the ITC test works well. The overall quality shows that about 45%similar to 62% of the total data is higher for u(*) 66%similar to 68% for sensible heat flux, 62%similar to 65% for latent flux and 52%similar to 54% for CO2 flux. The proportion of the high quality of u(*) obtained by DR is 17% higher than PF, while that of the latter three kinds of fluxes obtained by PF is 2% 3% higher than DR. The difference between PF and FPF is mainly in u(*). Comparing the three coordinate rotations in the dominant wind direction, DR still obtains the best quality of u(*). The use of DR is recommended in the complex terrain for reducing calculation and improving the data quality.

A Re-Examination of Density Effects in Eddy Covariance Measurements of CO2 Fluxes

An Alternative Approach for CO2 Flux Correction Caused by Heat and Water Vapour Transfer

Consequences of Incomplete Surface Energy Balance Closure for CO2 Fluxes from Open-Path CO2/H2O Infrared Gas Analysers

Uncertainties in Turbulent Statistics and Fluxes of CO2 Associated with Density Effect Corrections

Air-Sea Carbon-Dioxide Flux Estimated by Eddy Covariance Method from A Buoy Observation

Based on Atmospheric Physics and Ecological Principle to Assess the Accuracies of Field CO2/H2O Measurements from Infrared Gas Analyzers in Closed‐Path Eddy‐Covariance Systems

Advances in Air-Sea CO2 Flux Study and the Application of Eddy Covariance Technique

Correcting Method of Eddy Covariance Fluxes over Non-Flat Surfaces and Its Application in Chinaflux

Mechanistic Links Between Underestimated CO 2 Fluxes and Non-Closure of the Surface Energy Balance in a Semi-Arid Sagebrush Ecosystem

Scalar Flux Profiles in the Unstable Atmospheric Surface Layer under the Influence of Large Eddies: Implications for Eddy Covariance Flux Measurements and the Non‐Closure Problem

Implications of Energy Balance Non-Closure on Carbon Dioxide Flux Uncertainties: Insights from Large Eddy Simulations in Convective Boundary Layers

Incorporating the effect of heterogeneous surface heating into a semi-empirical model of the surface energy balance closure.

Over 100-fold improvement in the accuracy of relaxed eddy accumulation flux estimates through error diffusion

Numerical Investigation of Observational Flux Partitioning Methods for Water Vapor and Carbon Dioxide

Corrected calculations for soil and ecosystem measurements of CO2 flux using the LI-COR 6200 portable photosynthesis system

METHOD OF ACQUIRING HIGH QUALITY SURFACE TURBULENT FLUXES OVER THE LOESS PLATEAU

Quantifying the Effects of Wind Turbulence on CO2 Flux Measurement in a Closed Chamber

Analysis of Correction Method on Eddy Flux Measurement over Complex Terrain

What Eddy‐covariance Measurements Tell Us about Prior Land Flux Errors in CO2‐flux Inversion Schemes

Determination of averaging period parameter and its effects analysis for eddy covariance measurements

Uncertainties in temperature statistics and fluxes determined by sonic anemometers due to wind-induced vibrations of mounting arms