Abstract:Background: Increasing life spans of populations and a growing demand for more advanced care make effective and cost-efficient provision of health care necessary. eHealth technology is often proposed, although research on barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth technology is still scarce and fragmented. Objective: The aim of this study is to explore the perceptions concerning barriers to and facilitators of the implementation of eHealth among policy makers and service users and explore the ways in which their perceptions converge and differ. Methods: This study used interview data from policy makers at different levels of health care (n=7) and service users enrolled in eHealth interventions (n=25). The analysis included separate qualitative content analyses for the 2 groups and then a second qualitative content analysis to explore differences and commonalities. Results: Implementation barriers perceived by policy makers were that not all service users benefit from eHealth and that there is uncertainty about the impact of eHealth on the work of health care professionals. Policy makers also perceived political decision-making as complex; this included problems related to provision of technical infrastructure and lack of extra resources for health care digitalization. Facilitators were policy makers' conviction that eHealth is what citizens want, their belief in eHealth solutions as beneficial for health care practice, and their belief in the importance of health care digitalization. Barriers for service users comprised capability limitations and varied preferences of service users and a mismatch of technology with user needs, lack of data protection, and their perception of eHealth as being more time consuming. Facilitators for service users were eHealth technology design and match with their skill set, personal feedback and staff support, a sense of privacy, a credible sender, and flexible use of time.There were several commonalities between the 2 stakeholder groups. Facilitators for both groups were the strong impetus toward technology adoption in society and expectations of time flexibility. Both groups perceived barriers in the difficulties of tailoring eHealth, and both groups expressed uncertainty about the care burden distribution. There were also differences: policy makers perceived that their decision-making was very complex and that resources for implementation were limited. Service users highlighted their need to feel that their digital data were protected and that they needed to trust the eHealth sender. Conclusions: Perceptions about barriers to and facilitators of eHealth implementation varied among stakeholders in different parts of the health care system. The study points to the need to reach an enhanced mutual understanding of priorities and overcome challenges at both the micro and macro levels of the health care system. More well-balanced decisions at the policy-maker level may lead to more effective and sustainable development and future implementation of eHealth.

Universal health coverage and equal access in Sweden: a century-long perspective on macro-level policy

Inequity in access to digital public primary healthcare in Sweden: a cross-sectional study of the effects of urbanicity and socioeconomic status on utilization

Private health insurance in the United States and Sweden: A comparative review

Achieving high-quality universal health coverage: a perspective from the National Health Service in England

Swedish quality: a historical perspective and reflections for the future

Experiences of central child health services teams regarding a special governmental investment in child health services

Impact of an oral care subsidization reform on intersectional inequities in self-rated oral health in Sweden

Calling for allied efforts to strengthen digital health literacy in Sweden: perspectives of policy makers

A novel application of interrupted time series analysis to identify the impact of a primary health care reform on intersectional inequities in avoidable hospitalizations in the adult Swedish population

Universal health coverage as hegemonic health policy in low- and middle-income countries: A mixed-methods analysis

The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care

Citizens' Use of eHealth Services During COVID-19 in Relation to National Policy Goals

Factors Influencing Development and Implementation of Patients' Access to Electronic Health Records—A Comparative Study of Sweden and the Netherlands

A Review of Policies and Practices Related to the “Highest-Low” Fertility of Sweden

Benchmarking Sweden's Digitalization Transformation Strategy-Is It a Good Fit for the UAE?

Client/patient perceptions of achieving equity in primary health care: a mixed methods study

Perspectives of Policy Makers and Service Users Concerning the Implementation of eHealth in Sweden: Interview Study

Universal health coverage: the way forward

Healthcare provision for Swedish persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities

Privatising, liberalising and dividing a welfare state without affecting universality? Debunking the myths surrounding the rapid rise of private health insurance in Sweden

The Self-Exempting Activist: Sweden and the International Human Rights Regime