Abstract:Objectives: The Finnish dental care market operates as a dual system, divided between a regulated, affordable public sector and a less regulated, more expensive private sector that receives public subsidies. In 2015 and 2016, two policy interventions were introduced to reduce these subsidies for private dental services. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of these policy changes on the dental care market. Methods: This study was a realist evaluation. Context-Intervention-Mechanism-Outcome-configurations were applied to elicit an initial program theory (IPT) for the policy interventions. The IPT allowed a complicated system to be reduced to the main components, allowing for better understanding of the underlying mechanisms and the chain of events started by the interventions. The resulting hypotheses about the chain of events and outcomes were tested against a dataset collected from the Social Insurance Institution of Finland (SII) registries on public and private dental visits in the cities of Espoo, Helsinki and Oulu during the years 2010-2016. The used dataset consisted of N = 17 111 625 dental procedures or N = 8 139 990 individual visits (which can include several procedures) at a public (n = 9 097 407 procedures, n = 4 083 475 visits) or a private (n = 8 014 218 procedures or n = 4 056 515 visits) dental clinic. The system was studied during three time periods related to the two interventions in 2015 and in 2016. Changes were evaluated by statistically analysing changes in several key metrics: mean subsidy, mean out-of-pocket price, mean (non-subsidized) price, number of patients treated, number of professionals, procedures per professional, Case-Mix adjusted procedures per professional, patient-to-professional ratio, total procedures. Results: The 2015 and 2016 reductions to the subsidization of private dental care reduced the average subsidies paid to the private dental sector by 49% [-49.1, -38.8]. A 26% [25.2, 26.7] increase in the out-of-pocket price paid in the private sector was observed. Over the 2 years, 12.2% of patients left the private sector and an increase of 13% was observed in the number of patients treated in the public sector. The public sector increased its number of dental care professionals by 2.3% and the patient-to-professional ratio increased by 9.9% over the 2 years, while the private sector lost 4.6% of its dental care professionals and increased its prices by 4.0% [3.5, 4.5]. Conclusions: The policy changes had tangible effects on both the private and public sectors of the Finnish dental care market. By reducing subsidies, the private sector became more expensive for patients, causing many to transition to the public sector for their dental needs. While the public sector increased its capacity to accommodate the rise in patients, the demand still outpaced the growth in professionals, hinting at capacity or resource constraints in the public sector. The results also show initial evidence that contrary to the objectives, the policy changes increased the cost to the public sector as subsidized patient cared for in the private sector costs less to the government than treating that same patient in the public sector.

Impact of an oral care subsidization reform on intersectional inequities in self-rated oral health in Sweden

A novel application of interrupted time series analysis to identify the impact of a primary health care reform on intersectional inequities in avoidable hospitalizations in the adult Swedish population

Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data

A realist evaluation of policy interventions to reduce public subsidies of private dental care in Finland

Impact of self-perceived oral health and socio-economic factors on oral health-related behavior in Estonian adults

Refraining from seeking dental care among the Sámi in Sweden: a cross-sectional study

Change in avoidable hospitalizations for low-income elders following quasi-market reform in primary care – Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

Self-perceived oral health among 19-year-olds in a Swedish County--A comparative study between 2004 and 2011

Inequity in access to digital public primary healthcare in Sweden: a cross-sectional study of the effects of urbanicity and socioeconomic status on utilization

Trends in socioeconomic inequality of periodontal health status among Dutch adults: a repeated cross-sectional analysis over two decades

Socioeconomic inequalities in the non-use of dental care in Europe

An individually tailored treatment programme for improved oral hygiene: introduction of a new course of action in health education for patients with periodontitis

Experiences of central child health services teams regarding a special governmental investment in child health services

Evaluation of an early childhood caries preventive programme starting during pregnancy—Results after 3 and 6 years

Measuring And Decomposing Socioeconomic-Related Inequality In The Use Of Oral Health Services Among Chinese Adults

Changing from disease‐centred to person‐centred – Swedish dental hygienists' views on a theory‐based behavioural intervention for improved oral hygiene among adolescents

Social inequities in early childhood caries in Australia: A population‐based study on statewide public dental services data

Impact of income and financial subsidies on oral health care utilization among persons with disabilities in Singapore

Assessment of the Association between Socioeconomic Factors and Dental Health Disparities Over a Decade

Does the implementation of a national oral health policy reduce inequalities in oral health services utilization? The Brazilian experience

Towards health equity: core components of an extended home visiting intervention in disadvantaged areas of Sweden