On correlating the growth of transplanted tumours with the immune response of the host.

R. Gershon,R. Carter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00007890-196805000-00025

Transplantation

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Private health insurance in the United States and Sweden: A comparative review

Udit Dave,Emma G Lewis,Jenilkumar H Patel,Nikhil Godbole

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/hsr2.1979

2024-03-14

Abstract:Background and aims: The United States of America and Sweden both contain a public and private component to their healthcare systems. While both countries spend a similar amount per capita on public healthcare expenditures, the United States spends significantly more in the private healthcare sector. Sweden has a social democratic model of health care, and given its identity as a welfare state, private health insurance providers have a small and nuanced role. Methods: This paper was completed after searches were queried for "Sweden," "United States," and variants of the words "insurance," "public," "private," "Medicare," "Medicaid," "public," and "costs." A preliminary search in May 2022, yielded 78 articles, of which 45 were ultimately considered relevant for this review. Inclusion criteria consisted of English language articles, topic relevance, and verification of MEDLINE-indexed journals. These searches were performed in PubMed, Google Scholar, Embase, and Cochrane. Summary findings of these searches are compiled in this review. Results: Sweden guarantees low-cost appropriate care to all citizens with equitable access; however, drawbacks of its system include high financial burden, lack of primary care infrastructure, as well as geographical and socioeconomic inequities. On the other hand, the United States' healthcare system is built around the private sector with public health insurance reserved only for the most vulnerable patient populations. Conclusion: Our goal is to provide an overview, compare the role of private health insurance in both countries, and highlight policies that have had beneficial effects in each nation. Possible solutions to the drawbacks of each nation's health insurance policies could be addressed by additional support to Sweden's vulnerable population by developing a program similar to the US' Medicare Advantage program. Conversely, the United States may benefit from increasing access to public health insurance, especially in instances where families face unemployment.
Constructing health consumers: Private health insurance discourses in Australia and the United Kingdom

Kirsten Harley,Karen Willis,Jonathan Gabe,Stephanie Doris Short,Fran Collyer,Kristin Natalier,Michael Calnan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5172/hesr.2011.20.3.306

2011-09-01

Health Sociology Review

Abstract:Significant transformations of the health care services sector over the past three decades have seen an increasing reliance on the private provision of health care services mediated through private health insurance. In countries such as Australia and the UK, private health insurance is promoted as providing a greater choice for individuals and easing the burden on the public system. While these claims, the policy contexts and the decision-making processes of individual consumers have attracted some sociological attention, little has been said about the role of private insurers. In this article we present a comparative analysis of the websites of private health insurers in Australia and the UK. Our analysis highlights adoption by private health insurers of neoliberal discourses of choice and individual responsibility, partnership and healthy lifestyles. In these respects, similarities between the discourses over-ride national differences which might otherwise be expected given their contrasting health care traditions and contexts.

health policy & services,sociology
Change in avoidable hospitalizations for low-income elders following quasi-market reform in primary care – Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

Sofia Sveréus,Max Petzold,Clas Rehnberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116711

IF: 5.379

2024-02-24

Social Science & Medicine

Abstract:Quasi-market reforms have been increasingly implemented in tax-funded health care, but their effects in terms of equity, quality and socioeconomic differentials in quality remain sparsely studied. We create a natural experiment setup exploiting the differential timing of a set of quasi-market reforms – including patient choice, free establishment of providers and changes in provider remuneration –, implemented in primary care in the two largest Swedish regions (Stockholm and Västra Götaland) in 2008–2009. Using a database with individual level data from 2005 to 2009, we construct a difference-in-difference-in-differences model that compares pre to post reform changes in avoidable hospitalizations (AHs) for low-income elders as compared to a matched comparison group, in the region exposed to, versus unexposed to, reform (total N ∼ 200 000). The results show that for low-income elders – a group dominated by older women - reform led to higher AH rates, i.e., worse primary health care quality, than what would have been the case in absence of reform. Specifically, low-income elders exposed to reform missed out on improvements in AHs seen simultaneously in the unexposed region. At the same time, the reform had on average no effect for comparable, non-low-income, peers. The fact that this pattern was specific for avoidable hospitalizations - judged as amenable to interventions in primary care -, but not present for total hospitalizations, supports that it was driven by reform implementation rather than other factors. The study contributes with high-quality empirical evidence to a policy relevant but sparsely researched area and highlights the necessity to consider differential effects of organizational changes across socioeconomic groups.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data

Per E Gustafsson,Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodríguez,Miguel San Sebastián,Bo Burström,Paola A Mosquera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11434-w

2024-08-23

Abstract:Background: The Swedish Primary Health Care (PHC) system has, like in other European countries, undergone a gradual transition towards marketization and privatization, most distinctly through a 2010 choice reform. The reform led to an overall but regionally heterogenous expansion of private PHC providers in Sweden, and with evidence also pointing to possible inequities in various aspects of PHC provision. Evidence on the reform's impact on population-level primary health care performance and equity in performance remains scarce. The present study therefore aimed to examine whether the increase in private provision after the reform impacted on population-average rates of avoidable hospitalizations, as well as on corresponding socioeconomic inequities. Methods: This register-based study used a multiple-group interrupted time-series design for the study period 2001-2017, with the study population (N = 51 million observations) randomly drawn from the total Swedish population aged 18-85 years. High, medium, and low implementing comparison groups were classified by tertiles of increase in private PHC providers after the reform. PHC performance was measured by avoidable hospitalizations, and socioeconomic position by education and income. Interrupted time series analysis based on individual-level data was used to estimate the reform impact on avoidable hospitalization risk, and on inequities through the Relative Index of Inequality (RII). Results: All three comparisons groups displayed decreasing risk of avoidable hospitalizations but increasing socioeconomic inequities across the study period. Compared to regions with little change in provision after the reform, regions with large increase in private provision saw a steeper decrease in avoidable hospitalizations after the reform (relative risk (95%): 1.6% (1.1; 2.1)), but at the same time steeper increase in inequities (by education: 2.0% (0.1%; 4.0); by income: 2.2% (-0.1; 4.3)). Conclusions: The study suggests that the increase in private health care centers, enabled by the choice reform, contributed to a small improvement when it comes to overall PHC performance, but simultaneously to increased socioeconomic inequities in PHC performance. This duality in the impact of the Swedish reform also reflects the arguments in the European health policy debate on patient choice PHC models, with hopes of improved performance but fears of increased inequities.
Reframing the public/private debate on healthcare services: Tracking boundaries in the National Health Service

Hannah Cowan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9566.13758

2024-02-25

Sociology of Health & Illness

Abstract:This paper intervenes in the dichotomous debate on the 'privatisation' of the UK's National Health Service (NHS). Whilst research suggests that involving private‐sector actors and principles deviates from the founding aims of the NHS to deliver equitable healthcare for all, the opposing argument to 'keep our NHS public' also limits understanding and alternative possibilities. Through focusing on maintaining overarching structures, these campaigns fail to address everyday medical practices that have long been critiqued by those allied with the sociology of health and illness. This paper draws on feminist critiques of public/private to expand the structural economic lens of mainstream political debates and explore how multiple forms of economic, social, cultural, and symbolic capital, operate in everyday healthcare practices. Through an historically‐informed ethnographic exploration of routine hip replacements, I find that capital itself emerges through relations between people and things, and that public/private boundaries play an integral role in forming these relations to instil value on particular patients and forms of labour, demarcating what kind of healthcare is given to whom. I therefore suggest future action should focus on assembling healthcare relations beyond the dualism of public/private categories, to create multiple safe places and relations for all.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical,sociology
Neoliberalism and health care: the case of the Irish nursing home sector

Julien Mercille

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2017.1371277

2017-09-04

Critical Public Health

Abstract:The usefulness of neoliberalism as a theoretical concept in health research has been debated. This paper argues that when the concept of neoliberalism is used precisely and concretely, it provides an important and valid framework to analyse how health systems have been transformed over the last several decades. This claim is illustrated through the case of the Irish nursing home sector, which, over the last 20 years, has been turned upside down: from a mostly public system, it has been restructured into a mostly private, for-profit one. Privatisation, a quintessential neoliberal outcome, is analysed in detail. It was fostered by several neoliberal policies and has benefitted Irish (and to some extent global) economic elites. Tax incentives for private home operators and government budgetary constraints have limited state involvement in service provision and supported the expansion of the private sector. Private home staff are subject to more ‘flexible’ working conditions, which benefits employers. Moreover, the government plans to build new public nursing homes via public–private partnerships, which amount to privatisation. Also, global nursing home chains have begun to enter the Irish market, which offers profitable opportunities to international investors. However, international research shows that quality of care tends to be lower in private homes, due to cost cutting to increase profits.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
Embedded Liberalism and Health Populism in the UK in a Post-Truth Era

Louise Dalingwater

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v11i1.5923

2023-03-30

Politics and Governance

Abstract:The National Health Service (NHS), as a symbol of public health protection in the UK, was weaponised in pro-Brexit debates. It was suggested that European integration might inherently have undermined embedded liberalism and notably contributed to what Ruggie described as the "unbundling of sovereignty" (Ruggie, 1993). The manipulation of the NHS by right-wing populists has already been the focus of a number of articles, but calls to protect public health care from global threats have also come from left-wing politicians and activists. This article is particularly interested in socialist populist appeals to protect health care. It aims to show that for socialists the compromise between capital and labour and the protection of welfare systems, which is referred to as embedded liberalism, has not been achieved. In fact, furthering trade and investment is currently seen to be compromising the last remnants of a welfare state, which is embodied by the NHS in the UK. This conceptual article will thus start by presenting the theory of embedded liberalism. It will then establish the link between the breakdown of embedded liberalism in relation to health care systems. It will finally present populist and activist narratives on health and the UK's national health service from an international perspective. It draws on secondary literature and a corpus of popular press articles and grey literature produced by civil society organisations.

political science
The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care

M I Harrison,J Calltorp

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/s0168-8510(99)00060-3

IF: 3.255

Health Policy

Abstract:Sweden was an important pioneer of market-oriented reform in publicly funded health-care systems. Yet by the mid-1990s the county councils, which fund and manage most health-care, had substantially scaled back reforms based on provider competition while continuing to constrain health budgets. As policy makers faced new issues, they turned increasingly to longer-term and more cooperative contracts to define relations between hospitals and the county councils. Growing regionalization of government and hospital mergers further reconfigured acute care and limited opportunities for competition between hospitals. We seek to explain this reorientation of market-oriented reforms between 1989 and 1996 in terms of shifts in the positions taken by powerful policy actors, and in particular by county council politicians. During this period, elections moved liberal and conservative politicians, who were the most enthusiastic supporters of market-oriented reform, in and out of control of most county governments. Meanwhile many Social Democratic politicians gradually turned from initial support of competitive reform toward opposition. Politicians and county administrators from all parties were particularly concerned about controlling health expenditures during a period of recession. In addition, the public, politicians in the counties and municipalities, and health professionals resisted steps that threatened health sector employment and would have allowed market mechanisms, rather than governments, to determine the prices and distribution of health services. During the years under study Sweden's market-oriented reforms followed a course of development similar to that taken by other management and policy fashions (Abrahamson E. Management fashion, Academy of Management Review 1996;21: 254-85). At first the reforms enjoyed uncritical support by a broad spectrum of stakeholders. Gradually participants in the reform process recognized inherent tensions among the goals of the reform, conflicts between reform programs and fundamental social and political values, unrealistic assumptions about the effects of competition, technical and organizational obstacles to implementation, and threats to interest groups. Since 1998, there have been indications that Sweden may be entering yet another stage of experimentation with market-oriented reform.
Reconsidering the role of private health funds in Australia: a dynamic model

John F Bridges

Abstract:In recent years the private sector has played a more important role in the funding and provision of Australian hospital care as a consequence of federal government policies aimed at increasing participation in private health insurance (health funds). These policies include tax incentives, a 30% rebate on premiums and lifetime community rating (premiums set by age). While these policies have improved the short-term profitability of the private sector, its long-term success is not certain. This is because negotiations between health funds and private hospitals are often myopic, the nature of the insurance product may be inefficient, and there is a general lack of academic research on the private sector. This paper highlights the importance of the relationship between health funds and private hospitals in ensuring the long-term viability of the industry. It uses a simple overlapping generations model to demonstrate that it is not only the price that health funds pay that impacts on the capital value of hospitals, but also it is important how they structure their policies and attract individuals. The model demonstrates the potential benefits of implementing health insurance based on intertemporal transfers of funds rather than the current cross-subsidization. Such a policy would see health funds become an important store of capital. Also highlighted are the difficulties of discussing fundamental changes to the health care system. While recent health care reforms have been described as driven by ideology rather than evidence, in the Australian context there is little evidence on which to base policy. Researchers need to be more proactive in their consideration and evaluation of alternative health care policies. Through quality research on the private sector, academics can better guide policy makers at the national and institutional level.
The benefits of privatization

V Dirnfeld

1996-08-15

CMAJ

Abstract:The promise of a universal, comprehensive, publicly funded system of medical care that was the foundation of the Medical Care Act passed in 1966 is no longer possible. Massive government debt, increasing health care costs, a growing and aging population and advances in technology have challenged the system, which can no longer meet the expectations of the public or of the health care professions. A parallel, private system, funded by a not-for-profit, regulated system of insurance coverage affordable for all wage-earners, would relieve the overstressed public system without decreasing the quality of care in that system. Critics of a parallel, private system, who base their arguments on the politics of fear and envy, charge that such a private system would "Americanize" Canadian health care and that the wealthy would be able to buy better, faster care than the rest of the population. But this has not happened in the parallel public and private health care systems in other Western countries or in the public and private education system in Canada. Wealthy Canadians can already buy medical care in the United States, where they spend $1 billion each year, an amount that represents a loss to Canada of 10,000 health care jobs. Parallel-system schemes in other countries have proven that people are driven to a private system by dissatisfaction with the quality of service, which is already suffering in Canada. Denial of choice is unacceptable to many people, particularly since the terms and conditions under which Canadians originally decided to forgo choice in medical care no longer apply.
Determinants of attitude and intention towards private health insurance: a comparison of insured and uninsured young adults in Australia

Lisa Tam,Ellen Tyquin,Amisha Mehta,Ingrid Larkin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-021-06249-y

2021-03-19

Abstract:Background: Since the introduction in 1984 of Australia's publicly-funded universal healthcare system, Medicare, healthcare financing has relied on a mix of public and private sources to meet the needs of the population (Sowa et al., Appl Health Econ Health Policy 15:31-41, 2018). However, in recent years, there has been a decline in the number of Australians choosing to purchase private health insurance (PHI), particularly within the young adult age group with the proportion of insurance customers aged 20 to 29 falling from 10.3 to 9.4% between 2012 and 2017 (Sivey, The Conversation, 2017). Young adults are critical to private health insurance funding models as their involvement offsets the drawdown by older adults (Dalzell and Borys, ABC News, 2019). While this issue is widely reported in the Australian media, few empirical studies have explored the factors that enable or constrain young adults' enrolment in PHI. Methods: To address the scarcity of research about the motivational factors behind young adult decision-making, this study conducted a survey of 594 Australian young adults aged between 18 and 30 years. Within this age group, the survey sought an equal split of participants who were members and non-members of PHI schemes. Conclusion: The findings identified perceived value and trust in insurers as additional motivational factors alongside traditional measures of recognition of the problem and involvement in the problem. Differences between the insured and uninsured groups were identified which help to shape a more holistic understanding of the key motivational factors and barriers in relation to Australian young adults' enrolment in PHI.
Privatisation of government services in Australia: what is known about health and equity impacts

Julia Anaf,Toby Freeman,Fran Baum

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12992-024-01036-w

2024-04-18

Globalization and Health

Abstract:Historically in Australia, all levels of government created collective wealth by owning and operating infrastructure, and managing natural assets, key public goods and essential services while being answerable to the public. This strong state tradition was challenged in the 1980s when privatisation became a widespread government approach globally. Privatisation involves displacing the public sector through modes of financing, ownership, management and product or service delivery. The Australian literature shows that negative effects from privatisation are not spread equitably, and the health and equity impacts appear to be under-researched. This narrative overview aims to address a gap in the literature by answering research questions on what evidence exists for positive and negative outcomes of privatisation; how well societal impacts are evaluated, and the implications for health and equity.

public, environmental & occupational health
Welfare Reforms in the Nordic Countries:Policy Implementation,Performances and Institutional Constraints

LIN Ka

2008-01-01

Abstract:This paper first provides a general overview about the welfare reforms in the Nordic countries since the 1990s, based on which the author evaluates the effects of these reforms. It appears that the original objectives of these reforms, that is, to encourage and stimulate the development of non-public institutions by reducing state welfare in order to lower the state's burden, have not yet been fully realised. What factors make it so difficult to develop the non-public welfare providers in the Nordic countries? In a way of sectoral analysis, this research offers the readers some clues to this question. It takes the interplay of the private and public institutions under the social democratic model of welfare states as the key of interpretation. With this "interplay" , people's living and welfare conditions are perceived not only as private but as public affairs. This situation creates a functional necessity for the operation of a state welfare system. Thus, by examining the institutional relations among the state, market, associations, communities, families and individuals, this study explores a particular type of institutional order in these Nordic countries. Under this order, the private and public sectors are both well integrated and mutually supported, which is the fundamental reason for the durability of the Nordic welfare model.
Political Determinants of Health: Healthcare Privatization and Population Health in Europe

Alexandru D. Moise,Tamara Popic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1215/03616878-11257024

2024-04-03

Abstract:Abstract The extent to which healthcare reforms affect health remains understudied. Healthcare reforms result in policy outputs that determine provision of medical services, which have consequences for the health of the population. We scrutinize this relationship between health policy outputs and population health, using an original dataset of healthcare reforms passed in 36 European countries from 1989 to 2019. Focusing more specifically on legislative changes implying privatization of healthcare delivery and finance, we ask the following question: What is the relationship between reforms that privatize healthcare provision and population health in terms of health outcomes and inequalities? We answer this question by relying on fixed effects time-series cross-section models. Health outcomes are operationalized using measures of subjective health status, unmet health needs and resulting health inequalities. Our results show that privatization of healthcare is associated with higher rates of bad subjective health and unmet health needs several years after the passing of reforms. These effects are stronger for individuals in the lower tiers of income and education, resulting in higher socio-economic inequalities. The article contributes to conceptualization of the political determinants of health as health policy outputs and a better understanding of the relationship between policy outputs and population health outcomes.

social sciences, biomedical,health care sciences & services,health policy & services,social issues
The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision

Simon Marginson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-005-8230-y

2007-03-01

Higher Education

Abstract:Our common understandings of the public/private distinction in higher education are drawn from neo-classical economics and/or statist political philosophy. However, the development of competition and markets at the national level, and the new potentials for private and public goods created by globalisation in higher education, have exposed weaknesses in the traditional notions of public/private. For example, (1) the statist notion that higher education is always/already a public good blinds us to its role in producing scarce positional private goods, even in free systems; (2) because there is no global state, both statists and neo-liberals model the global higher education environment simply as a trading environment without grasping the potential for global public goods in education – goods that are subject to non-rivalry or non-excludability, and broadly available across populations, on a global scale. Yet higher education in one nation has the potential to create positive and negative externalities in another; and all higher education systems and institutions can benefit from collective systems e.g. that facilitate cross-border recognition and mobility. The paper sets out to revise public/private in higher education. Rather than defining public/private in terms of legal ownership, it focuses on the social character of the goods. It argues that public/private goods are not always zero sum and under certain conditions provide conditions of possibility for each other. It proposes (a) units in national government that focus specifically on cross-border effects; (b) global policy spaces – taking in state agencies, individual universities, NGOs and commercial agents – to consider the augmentation, distribution of and payment for global public goods.

education & educational research
A novel application of interrupted time series analysis to identify the impact of a primary health care reform on intersectional inequities in avoidable hospitalizations in the adult Swedish population

Per E. Gustafsson,Osvaldo Fonseca-Rodríguez,Sara Castel Feced,Miguel San Sebastián,João Luiz Bastos,Paola A. Mosquera

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2024.116589

IF: 5.379

2024-01-14

Social Science & Medicine

Abstract:Primary health care (PHC) systems are a crucial instrument for achieving equitable population health, but there is little evidence of how PHC reforms impact equities in population health. In 2010, Sweden implemented a reform that promoted marketization and privatization of PHC. The present study uses a novel integration of intersectionality-informed and evaluative epidemiological analytical frameworks to disentangle the impact of the 2010 Swedish PHC reform on intersectional inequities in avoidable hospitalizations. The study population comprised the total Swedish population aged 18–85 years across 2001–2017, in total 129 million annual observations, for whom register data on sociodemographics and hospitalizations due to ambulatory care sensitive conditions were retrieved. Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Analyses (MAIHDA) were run for the pre-reform (2001–2009) and post-reform (2010–2017) periods to provide a mapping of inequities. In addition, random effects estimates reflecting the discriminatory accuracy of intersectional strata were extracted from a series MAIHDAs run per year 2001–2017. The estimates were re-analyzed by Interrupted Time Series Analysis (ITSA), in order to identify the impact of the reform on measures of intersectional inequity in avoidable hospitalizations. The results point to a complex reconfiguration of social inequities following the reform. While the post-reform period showed a reduction in overall rates of avoidable hospitalizations and in age disparities, socioeconomic inequities in avoidable hospitalizations, as well as the importance of interactions between complex social positions, both increased. Socioeconomically disadvantaged groups born in the Nordic countries seem to have benefited the least from the reform. The study supports a greater attention to the potentially complex consequences that health reforms can have on inequities in health and health care, which may not be immediate apparent in conventional evaluations of either population-average outcomes, or by simple evaluations of equity impacts. Methodological approaches for evaluation of complex inequity impacts need further development.

public, environmental & occupational health,social sciences, biomedical
Private health insurance and health in a healthcare system with comprehensive public insurance

Elizabeth Baldwin,Jonas Fooken,David Rowell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00181-024-02680-2

IF: 3.2

2024-11-10

Empirical Economics

Abstract:A large literature shows that attaining private health insurance (PHI) improves the health of individuals who do not have access to healthcare that is provided free of charge. However, even when individuals already benefit from public health insurance, complementary and supplementary PHI may benefit population health. We study the association between health and PHI for hospital care in Australia that individuals purchase in addition to a comprehensive public health insurance and the provision of free care in public hospitals. We find that hospital PHI holders have better health but identify no significant relationship between attaining hospital PHI or between policy-induced PHI and health.

economics,social sciences, mathematical methods
[Immunologic properties of coli surface antigen 6(CS6) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and cholera toxin subunit B expressed in Shigella flexneri 2a strain T32].

T. Ying,Z. Han,E. Feng,H. L. Wang,Z. S. Zhang,G. Su,C. F. Huang

Abstract:A host-plasmid balancing system composed with a delta asd mutant (FaD) of an avirulent strain (T32) of Shigella flexneri 2a and plasmid harboring asd gene was used to express enterotoxigenic E. coli surface antigen 6(CS6) and V. cholerae toxin subunit B (CTB). The results of Western blotting and ELISA showed that all of recombinant plasmids (pYX201, pYX202 and pYX203) could be maintained stably and expressed CS6 and CTB respectively in T32 without any antibiotic selection. All the recombinant bacterial strains could elicit the corresponding antibodies in rabbits. The antibodies against CTB elicited by both FaD/pYX201 and FaD/pYX203 showed to be high level, and had long prolongation time, in otherwise, the antibodies against CS6 showed to be low level, indicating that higher expression level of foreign antigen may be benefit for construction of genetic multivalent vaccine.
The dual-peak light response of ganglion cells in chicken retina

Yi Zhou,Xue Liu,P. Liang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2006.12.070

IF: 3.61

2007-03-23

Brain Research

Abstract:
Magnesium sulfate therapy in preeclampsia is associated with increased urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate excretion.

J. Barton,B. Sibai,R. Ahokas,W. Whybrew,B. Mercer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9378(12)80014-7

IF: 9.8

1992-10-01

American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:

On correlating the growth of transplanted tumours with the immune response of the host.

Private health insurance in the United States and Sweden: A comparative review

Constructing health consumers: Private health insurance discourses in Australia and the United Kingdom

Change in avoidable hospitalizations for low-income elders following quasi-market reform in primary care – Evidence from a natural experiment in Sweden

Evaluating the impact of the 2010 Swedish choice reform in primary health care on avoidable hospitalization and socioeconomic inequities: an interrupted time series analysis using register data

Reframing the public/private debate on healthcare services: Tracking boundaries in the National Health Service

Neoliberalism and health care: the case of the Irish nursing home sector

Embedded Liberalism and Health Populism in the UK in a Post-Truth Era

The reorientation of market-oriented reforms in Swedish health-care

Reconsidering the role of private health funds in Australia: a dynamic model

The benefits of privatization

Determinants of attitude and intention towards private health insurance: a comparison of insured and uninsured young adults in Australia

Privatisation of government services in Australia: what is known about health and equity impacts

Welfare Reforms in the Nordic Countries:Policy Implementation,Performances and Institutional Constraints

Political Determinants of Health: Healthcare Privatization and Population Health in Europe

The public/private divide in higher education: A global revision

A novel application of interrupted time series analysis to identify the impact of a primary health care reform on intersectional inequities in avoidable hospitalizations in the adult Swedish population

Private health insurance and health in a healthcare system with comprehensive public insurance

[Immunologic properties of coli surface antigen 6(CS6) of enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and cholera toxin subunit B expressed in Shigella flexneri 2a strain T32].

The dual-peak light response of ganglion cells in chicken retina

Magnesium sulfate therapy in preeclampsia is associated with increased urinary cyclic guanosine monophosphate excretion.