Abstract:Abstract Automatic deception detection is a crucial task that has many applications both in direct physical and in computer-mediated human communication. Our focus is on automatic deception detection in text across cultures. In this context, we view culture through the prism of the individualism/collectivism dimension, and we approximate culture by using country as a proxy. Having as a starting point recent conclusions drawn from the social psychology discipline, we explore if differences in the usage of specific linguistic features of deception across cultures can be confirmed and attributed to cultural norms in respect to the individualism/collectivism divide. In addition, we investigate if a universal feature set for cross-cultural text deception detection tasks exists. We evaluate the predictive power of different feature sets and approaches. We create culture/language-aware classifiers by experimenting with a wide range of n-gram features from several levels of linguistic analysis, namely phonology, morphology and syntax, other linguistic cues like word and phoneme counts, pronouns use, etc., and token embeddings. We conducted our experiments over eleven data sets from five languages (English, Dutch, Russian, Spanish, and Romanian), from six countries (United States of America, Belgium, India, Russia, Mexico, and Romania), and we applied two classification methods, namely logistic regression and fine-tuned BERT models. The results showed that the undertaken task is fairly complex and demanding. Furthermore, there are indications that some linguistic cues of deception have cultural origins and are consistent in the context of diverse domains and data set settings for the same language. This is more evident for the usage of pronouns and the expression of sentiment in deceptive language. The results of this work show that the automatic deception detection across cultures and languages cannot be handled in unified manners and that such approaches should be augmented with knowledge about cultural differences and the domains of interest.

A corpus-based analysis of potential linguistic indicators of corporate deception in tobacco industry documents.

Which Spoken Language Markers Identify Deception in High-Stakes Settings? Evidence From Earnings Conference Calls

Detecting Deception through Linguistic Analysis

Looking for the Smoking Gun

On the Lexical Characteristics of Deception

Decoupling in CSR reports: A Linguistic Content Analysis of the Volkswagen Dieselgate scandal

An empirical evaluation of interpersonal deception theory in a real-world, high-stakes environment

Tone at the Bottom: Measuring Corporate Misconduct Risk from the Text of Employee Reviews

Domain-Independent Deception: A New Taxonomy and Linguistic Analysis

To Tell The Truth: Language of Deception and Language Models

Cultural Influence on Deceptive Communication

Causal markers in tobacco industry documents: the pragmatics of responsibility

Deciphering Deception: How Different Rhetoric of AI Language Impacts Users' Sense of Truth in LLMs

UNIDECOR: A Unified Deception Corpus for Cross-Corpus Deception Detection

Linguistic variation in the discourse of corporate annual reports: A multi-dimensional analysis

Analysing Deception in Witness Memory through Linguistic Styles in Spontaneous Language

A multi-dimensional analysis of deception

Domain-Independent Deception: Definition, Taxonomy and the Linguistic Cues Debate

Deception detection in text and its relation to the cultural dimension of individualism/collectivism

Can Factual Statements be Deceptive? The DeFaBel Corpus of Belief-based Deception

Maybe It’s Right, Maybe It’s Wrong: Structural and Social Determinants of Deception in Negotiation