Abstract:The philosophical, legal, and HCI literature concerning artificial intelligence (AI) has explored the ethical implications and values that these systems will impact on. One aspect that has been only partially explored, however, is the role of deception. Due to the negative connotation of this term, research in AI and Human–Computer Interaction (HCI) has mainly considered deception to describe exceptional situations in which the technology either does not work or is used for malicious purposes. Recent theoretical and historical work, however, has shown that deception is a more structural component of AI than it is usually acknowledged. AI systems that enter in communication with users, in fact, forcefully invite reactions such as attributions of gender, personality and empathy, even in the absence of malicious intent and often also with potentially positive or functional impacts on the interaction. This paper aims to operationalise the Human-Centred AI (HCAI) framework to develop the implications of this body of work for practical approaches to AI ethics in HCI and design. In order to achieve this goal, we take up the analytical distinction between "banal" and "strong" deception, originally proposed in theoretical and historical scholarship on AI (Natale in Deceitful media: artificial intelligence and social life after the turing test, Oxford University Press, New York, 2021), as a starting point to develop ethical reflections that will empower designers and developers with practical ways to solve the problems raised by the complex relationship between deception and communicative AI. The paper considers how HCAI can be applied to conversational AI (CAI) systems in order to design them to develop banal deception for social good and, at the same time, to avoid its potential risks.

Deciphering Deception: How Different Rhetoric of AI Language Impacts Users' Sense of Truth in LLMs

Deceptive AI systems that give explanations are more convincing than honest AI systems and can amplify belief in misinformation

Banal Deception Human-AI Ecosystems: A Study of People's Perceptions of LLM-generated Deceptive Behaviour

Deception and Manipulation in Generative AI

Caution with AI deception: AI could serve as the scapegoat of Human!

Unmasking the Shadows of AI: Investigating Deceptive Capabilities in Large Language Models

Truthful AI: Developing and governing AI that does not lie

Lies, Damned Lies, and Distributional Language Statistics: Persuasion and Deception with Large Language Models

Synthetic Lies: Understanding AI-Generated Misinformation and Evaluating Algorithmic and Human Solutions

Deception Abilities Emerged in Large Language Models

Human heuristics for AI-generated language are flawed

AI deception: A survey of examples, risks, and potential solutions

To Tell The Truth: Language of Deception and Language Models

Detecting Deception through Linguistic Analysis

Truth Machines: Synthesizing Veracity in AI Language Models

The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: The Role of AI Quality Disclosure in Lie Detection

AI-LieDar: Examine the Trade-off Between Utility and Truthfulness in LLM Agents

Deceptive AI Explanations: Creation and Detection

The Decoy Dilemma in Online Medical Information Evaluation: A Comparative Study of Credibility Assessments by LLM and Human Judges

Reframing Deception for Human-Centered AI

Emotional Manipulation Through Prompt Engineering Amplifies Disinformation Generation in AI Large Language Models