Abstract:Product harm crises are among a firm's worst nightmares.Brand equity is an important but fragile asset,which is easy to suffer loss in product harm crises.The mounting frequency of product harm crises and ill-prepared corporate response to such crises can have profound consequences for brand equity.Based on whether the product defects is a violation of regulation or safety standards,the product harm crises can be divided into two categories:defensible and indefensible product harm crises.This article discusses how to respond defensible product harm crises appropriately.By analyzing real defensible product harm crises in China,we found that companies responded to these crises differently,implying that they didn't reach consensus on which response was the best to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises.To resolve the question that which response strategy is the most effective to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises,this paper explores the impacts of response strategy,3rd part clarification,company reputation and psychological risk on brand equity.We implemented a 4(response strategy:defensive,attack,justification & accommoda-tive) × 2(company reputation:good & bad) × 2(3rd part clarification:with & without) between-group design,and empirical results are:(1) defensive response is the best,accommodative response is the worst,with other responses in the middle;(2) a 3rd part's clarification is more persuasive than that of companies and would narrow differences of company responses;(3) company reputation plays a positive moderating role,but only when the company implement defensive response and a 3rd part's clarification is available;(4) psychological risk is identified as a key mediator of brand equity in product harm crisis context,which indicates that response strategy,company reputation and 3rd part clarification impact on brand equity through psychological risk.These findings would help companies to better understand and protect their brand equities in defensible product harm crises.

Repair Purchase Intention in Product Harm Crisis

Resolve Product Harm Crisis for Manufacturing System: A Simultaneous Equation Model

Research on the Influence of Protecting Brand Equity in the Event of Defensible Product Harm Crisis by Appropriate Remedial Response:Moderating and Mediating Effects

How to Protect Brand Equity in Product Harm Crisis by Appropriate Response?

Stock market reaction to product-harm crisis response strategies

Research on the Effect of Coping Strategy for Product Harm Crisis

The Research on the Affect of Product - Harm Crisis Management Upon the Relation Between Brand Reputation and Brand Loyalty

How to Deal with Product Harm Crises Effectively——Based on the Correlational Literature Review

Risk‐reducing Strategies after a Product‐harm Crisis: the Moderating Role of Controllability Attribution

The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Customer Perceived Value

Marketing research on product-harm crises: a review, managerial implications, and an agenda for future research

Optimization of marketing retrieving strategies during product harm crisis

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies in Data Breach Management.

The Effect of Product-Harm Crises on the Financial Value of Firms under the Concept of Green Development

On the classification of product-harm crisis

The Impact of Product-Harm Crisis on Purchase Intention: Moderating Effects of Consumer Ethnocentrism - an Example of Toyota Recall

Impact of information processing on purchase intention in new energy vehicle product harm crises

Navigating through crisis: an empirical investigation of effective response strategies for reputation restoration

Managing the product-harm crisis in the digital era: The role of consumer online brand community engagement

The effects of firm actions on customers’ responses to product recall crises: analyzing an automobile recall in China

The Research of Attribution of Responsibility in Product Crisis Based on Brand Loyalty