Abstract:Product harm crises are among a firm's worst nightmares.Brand equity is an important but fragile asset,which is easy to suffer loss in product harm crises.The mounting frequency of product harm crises and ill-prepared corporate response to such crises can have profound consequences for brand equity.Based on whether the product defects is a violation of regulation or safety standards,the product harm crises can be divided into two categories:defensible and indefensible product harm crises.This article discusses how to respond defensible product harm crises appropriately.By analyzing real defensible product harm crises in China,we found that companies responded to these crises differently,implying that they didn't reach consensus on which response was the best to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises.To resolve the question that which response strategy is the most effective to protect brand equity in defensible product harm crises,this paper explores the impacts of response strategy,3rd part clarification,company reputation and psychological risk on brand equity.We implemented a 4(response strategy:defensive,attack,justification & accommoda-tive) × 2(company reputation:good & bad) × 2(3rd part clarification:with & without) between-group design,and empirical results are:(1) defensive response is the best,accommodative response is the worst,with other responses in the middle;(2) a 3rd part's clarification is more persuasive than that of companies and would narrow differences of company responses;(3) company reputation plays a positive moderating role,but only when the company implement defensive response and a 3rd part's clarification is available;(4) psychological risk is identified as a key mediator of brand equity in product harm crisis context,which indicates that response strategy,company reputation and 3rd part clarification impact on brand equity through psychological risk.These findings would help companies to better understand and protect their brand equities in defensible product harm crises.

Marketing research on product-harm crises: a review, managerial implications, and an agenda for future research

The Impact of a Product-Harm Crisis on Customer Perceived Value

The Research on the Affect of Product - Harm Crisis Management Upon the Relation Between Brand Reputation and Brand Loyalty

Advertising in a Context Harm Crisis

The Role of Corporate Reputation and Crisis Response Strategies in Data Breach Management.

Research on the Influence of Protecting Brand Equity in the Event of Defensible Product Harm Crisis by Appropriate Remedial Response:Moderating and Mediating Effects

Stock market reaction to product-harm crisis response strategies

Social Media Strategies in Product-Harm Crises

The Effects of Product-Harm Crisis on Brand Performance

The crisis‐response match: An empirical investigation

Retrospect and Prospect of Corporate Social Responsibility in Product- Harm Crises Abroad

Does Being Socially Responsible Buffer Reputation Loss in a Product Crisis? the Moderating Role of Lay Theory of Corporate Social Responsibility

Optimization of marketing retrieving strategies during product harm crisis

Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience

Managing the product-harm crisis in the digital era: The role of consumer online brand community engagement

Does a Firm's Product-Recall Strategy Affect Its Financial Value? an Examination of Strategic Alternatives During Product-Harm Crises

EXPRESS: Shifting Standards in Consumer Evaluations of Global and Local Brands after Product-harm Crises

The Impact of Product-Harm Crisis on Purchase Intention: Moderating Effects of Consumer Ethnocentrism - an Example of Toyota Recall

Research on the Product-harm Crisis Spillover Effect in a Network Environment---Based on the Perspective of Information Processing

The Impact of Product-harm Crisis on Consumer Brand Attitude in Network Environment——Based on the Accessibility-Diagnosticity Theory

Spillover Of Distrust From Domestic To Imported Brands In A Crisis-Sensitized Market