Abstract:China used to have a state- or enterprise-sponsored social protection system under the central planning regime. By the mid-1990s, however, it became increasingly clear that such an approach was no longer sustainable. Many enterprises had more retirees than current employees on their payrolls. This situation deteriorated further as tens of millions of workers were laid off in the late 1990s. The government then decided to establish a new, more sustainable social protection system. The central idea of the new social protection system is to make it self-sustaining through savings by employees, enterprises, and the government. The old approach of social protection made no prior saving, as all social burdens were covered by current revenue. In addition, the old system discriminated against rural residents. Cai and Du (2015) offer a very informative review of the evolution of social protection in China, particularly its progress and challenges. The new social protection system consists of three pillars – pensions, medical care, and social assistance. Perhaps the most impressive progress is that all these protection measures reach a substantial proportion of rural residents. But the evolving new social protection system still faces serious challenges on a number of fronts. The biggest challenge is the ageing of the Chinese population. In 2013, people aged 60 or more already accounted for 14.9% of the total population. This may rise to 16% in 2020. The second challenge is the funding problem. For instance, in 2013, about 322 million urban residents participated in the urban worker basic pension program, which was started in 1997, with about 80 million retirees, or roughly one quarter of the total, already having started to receive benefits from the program. Incoming revenues are simply not sufficient to cover payouts by the program. The third challenge is the rural–urban divide of social protection. Protection for rural residents is still much less than that for urban residents, which also creates difficulties for the new wave of urbanization. The household registration system is now a major obstacle for urbanization. Removal of the rural–urban divide, however, could have significant fiscal implications. Cai and Du (2015) correctly argue that, with comprehensive coverage, China needs to improve the social protection system to deal with rapid ageing and the integration of social protection system. Cai and Du identify four issues for policymakers to consider. First, China needs to maintain rapid productivity growth. Second, the government needs to identify certain social programs as the basic protection as the responsibility of the central government. Third, the social protection system should be extended to include all citizens. Finally, the government may raise the level of pooling, integrate across regions and among different government departments and agencies. The Chinese government had a number of additional choices to make in further developing the social protection system. The first choice is between fixed asset investment and social welfare spending. The government often prefers fixed asset investment over social welfare spending, mainly out of direct concerns about growth performance. Perhaps now is time for the government to focus more on spending on social welfare and social protection. The second choice is to raise the tax for social protection purposes now or later. Some economists argue that the funding gaps of the social welfare systems should be covered as soon as possible. However, in a recent study, Song et al. (2013) point out that, while reform is necessary to make the pension system financially balanced, an immediate reduction in the generosity of the system is not optimal. Reforming the system in a fully funded direction would harm the current generations by reducing intergenerational transfers, while yielding only small gains to future generations. The losses dwarf the gains from lower labor supply distortions. The third choice is to decide how much protection is appropriate, providing minimum support without causing significant inefficiency. While social protection definitely needs to be improved, the government should also guard against moving too quickly toward a welfare state. The eventual equalization of social protection for rural and urban residents is desirable, but abrupt changes are not ideal. The fourth choice is the division of labor between the central and local governments. Under the current regime, social protection is quite decentralized among different government agencies and different levels of government. As Cai and Du suggest, the central government should be responsible for basic or minimum social protection. The remaining matters should be the responsibility of local governments or even the responsibility of individuals and enterprises. The final choice is the coordination of social programs with a number of other reform policies. For instance, if the average retirement age of female workers and male workers can be postponed from 50 to 60, and 60 to 65, respectively, the immediate impacts of ageing may be eased significantly. This could buy some time for a gradual improvement of the social welfare system.

La Protection Sociale En Chine

A Survey on the Social Security of Peasant-workers

Comment on “the Social Protection System in Ageing China”

Le Régime De Sécurité Sociale Des Travailleurs Migrants En Chine

The Social Benefit System in Urban China: Reforms and Trends from 1988 to 2002

Réforme Du Marché Du Travail, Inégalités De Revenus Et Croissance Économique En Chine

Toward Shared Prosperity: China'S New Leap Forward in Social Protection

In the Service of Market Socialism: the Quest for A Welfare Model in China

Is China still a Low Welfare State?——A "NewLeap-forward" in China's Social Protection from a Comparative Perspective

The Effect of an Expansion of the Pay-as-You-Go Social Security System in China

The Chinese Welfare State in Transition: 1988–2007

How Security Service Responds to the Impact of the Social Security Law (浅谈保安服务业如何应对《社会保险法》实施的冲击)

SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN CHINA: 1988-2007

On Social Security System of Rural Area in China in New Stage.

Citizen Social Right in China:Retrospection,Reality and Suggestion for Policy-making

Social Security for China'S Migrant Workers

Social Safety Net Coverage in Urban and Rural China:The Issue of Horizontal Equity

Health in China. the Healthcare Market.

The Financing Pattern of Social Policy Expenditure in China:the Fair of Income Structure and the Incentive Effect

Pension System for the Rural Areas in Actual Social and Economic Conditions in China

Forced Savings, Social Safety Net, And Family Support A New Old-Age Security System For China