The Social Endowment Insurance System for Peasant-Workers: Dilemma and Theoretical Analysis
Yang Cui-ying
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3785/j.issn.1008-942x.2006.03.014
2006-01-01
Abstract:The social endowment insurance system for peasant-workers (SEISPW), which should play its role in ensuring numerous Chinese peasant-workers pension after their retirement, is operational in three different modes adopted in Guangdong and Shenzhen, Beijing, and Shanghai respectively. However, the practice of these three modes is far from being ideal. Limited coverage and low attendance are the main common problems. Operationally, these problems are caused by the conflicting attitudes adopted by the government and by enterprises and peasant-workers: the former is active, while the latter are passive. Specifically, the government has paid more attention to the SEISPW, given the different needs to cultivate labor market, to maintain social stability, and to solve the problems about agriculture, rural areas and farmers. On the contrary, enterprises think that social security is not good for increasing their competitiveness which, coupled with the pitfalls in the social security management and prevalent local protectionism, has discouraged them from showing an active attitude towards the SEISPW. Meanwhile, due to numerous factors affecting the solving of contradictions between moveable employment of peasant-workers and stable requirement for endowment insurance, peasant-workers do not show much interest in the SEISPW established by the government for them. In other words, the dilemma can be summed up as follows: firstly, insurance premium should be paid regularly while peasant-workers usually do not have lifetime occupation, and often change their jobs or cities where they work, or both. Secondly, the supply of a large amount of premium seems to be impossible. Thirdly, it is hard for peasant-workers to transfer insurance since there is much difference in coverage and premium ratio in different localities. Fourthly, peasant-workers' benefits gained from social securities could be both retained and ″disappear″ partly, because the endowment insurance at present is operated in a relatively closed environment. Fifthly, absence of effective computerized information system makes it even more difficult to coordinate different insurance institutions. To resolve the above-mentioned dilemma, it is necessary to establish the SEISPW in the long run and carry it out in a safe and steady way. So, to break down the institutional and conceptual barriers is the first thing to do. At the same time, to perfect both the basic social pension insurance for employees (BSPIE) and the rural social pension insurance (RSPI) is the basis on which to transfer insurance for peasant-workers. Secondly, it is necessary to reform the SEISPW in accounts management, pension allocating, etc., by taking account of moveable employment and low income, which characterize peasant-workers. And last, to create a good social environment will contribute a great deal to the implementation of SEISPW, such as coordinating insurance management in urban and rural areas, strengthening the information system and enforcing the law.