Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the causality between social security policies and farmland reallocation in rural China. Design/methodology/approach It quantitatively analyzes the impact of each ongoing social security policy on farmland reallocation based on a data set from the 2011 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS, 2011). Findings The study finds that the inclination of a village farmers' collective to reallocate farmland due to changes in the village population increased if social security policies do not effectively cover the village because farmers rely primarily on income from farmland to cover their basic living expenses. However, if social security policies provide adequate coverage, then farmers do not rely entirely on on-farm income and the likelihood of farmland reallocation decreases. Furthermore, the effectiveness of social security policies includes not only coverage but also the sufficiency of the security policies provided. Research limitations/implications First, the authors use only cross-sectional data in this study, which may result in biased estimation and also limit temporal examination of the impact of social security systems, farmland reallocation and related policy variables. This limitation may be especially important in China because the country is undergoing a rapid socioeconomic transition. However, the research is constrained by the available data. Furthermore, there could be endogeneity problems that are difficult to address, given the current data set. These problems could involve the impacts of village-level economic, natural and social variables, the implementation of related public policies (land development and consolidation, land expropriation, etc.) and other economic variables. Practical implications These findings may provide implications for related policy reform in the near future. Originality/value These findings may facilitate a recognition and understanding of the causality between social security policies and farmland reallocation in rural China.

SOCIAL WELFARE SYSTEM AND INCOME DISTRIBUTION IN CHINA: 1988-2007

The Chinese Welfare State in Transition: 1988–2007

Redistributive Nature of the Chinese Social Benefit System: Progressive or Regressive?

The Social Benefit System in Urban China: Reforms and Trends from 1988 to 2002

The Divided Chinese Welfare System: Do Health and Education Change the Picture?

Effectiveness of social welfare programmes on poverty reduction and income inequality in China

The Distribution Of Household Income In China: Inequality, Poverty And Policies

Transferring From The Poor To The Rich: Examining Regressive Redistribution In Chinese Social Insurance Programmes

The Welfare (Inequality and Growth) Effects of Urbanization: Empirical Evidence from China

The Impact of Social Security Policies on Farmland Reallocation in Rural China

Horizontal and Vertical Inequality of the Retirees' Income Distribution in China

Impacts of social welfare system on the employment status of low-income groups in urban China

The Imbalance of Pension Contribution in China and Its Impact on Residents’ Income Inequality

Demographic changes and household income in urban China: 1988-2002

Decomposition of the impact of government and private transfers on income inequality in China

The Long-Term Evolution of National Income Inequality and Rural Poverty in China

Four Decades of China’s Income Distribution Reform

Short-term Trends in China’s Income Inequality and Poverty: Evidence from a Longitudinal Household Survey

Overview: Incomes and inequality in China, 2007-2013

The Decline of Income Inequality in China: Assessments and Explanations*

Income distribution and health: What do we know from Chinese data?